Cleveland Clinic, Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1256-1266. doi: 10.1177/1073191119872253. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
The Boston Naming Test-Second edition (BNT-2) and the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery-Naming (NAB-N) subtest are two commonly used confrontation naming tests used to evaluate word-finding ability in individuals suspected of neurodegenerative disease. The BNT-2 and NAB-N are designed to measure the same construct; however, observations in practice suggest these two tests provide divergent estimates of naming ability. This study sought to systematically investigate the level of agreement between performance on the BNT-2 and NAB-N. Records from 105 consecutive referrals seen for neuropsychological evaluation as part of routine care in an outpatient memory disorders clinic were reviewed. Discrepancy scores, concordance correlation coefficients, and root mean squared differences were calculated between demographically adjusted -scores on the BNT-2 and NAB-N. Results indicated that estimates of word finding ability generated by the BNT-2 and NAB-N have a strong linear relationship but systematically generate scores that are inconsistent. Despite similar task demands, the BNT-2 and NAB-N provide different information about naming ability and further research is needed to understand these differences and inform clinicians on interpreting the naming estimates provided by each test.
波士顿命名测试第二版(BNT-2)和神经心理学评估电池命名(NAB-N)子测验是两种常用于评估疑似神经退行性疾病个体单词查找能力的常用命名测试。BNT-2 和 NAB-N 旨在测量相同的结构;然而,在实践中的观察表明,这两种测试提供了不同的命名能力估计。本研究旨在系统地研究 BNT-2 和 NAB-N 之间的性能一致性。对作为门诊记忆障碍诊所常规护理一部分进行神经心理评估的 105 例连续转诊记录进行了回顾。计算了 BNT-2 和 NAB-N 的调整后得分之间的差异得分、一致性相关系数和均方根差。结果表明,BNT-2 和 NAB-N 生成的单词查找能力估计值具有很强的线性关系,但系统地生成不一致的分数。尽管任务要求相似,但 BNT-2 和 NAB-N 提供了关于命名能力的不同信息,需要进一步研究以了解这些差异,并为临床医生解释每个测试提供的命名估计值提供信息。