Department of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 1;260:292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Although earlier studies have indicated that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals are at greater risk of psychiatric symptoms than heterosexual individuals, limited attention has been paid to the mental health disparities within LGB populations, especially in non-Western societies. This study examined the disparities in depression, anxiety, and mental well-being between gay/lesbian and bisexual individuals and investigated how the disparities are explained by the greater sexual identity stress experienced by bisexual individuals compared to their gay and lesbian counterparts.
The study sample included 931 cisgender LGB individuals in Hong Kong, with 70.1% identifying as gay/lesbian and 29.9% identifying as bisexual. They completed a self-report questionnaire on sexual identity stress and mental health.
Bisexual individuals showed higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms than lesbians and gay men. Structural equation modeling showed that, compared with lesbians and gay men, bisexual individuals were more likely to report identity uncertainty, conceal their sexual orientation, and have a weaker sense of connection to the LGBT community, which were in turn associated with greater affective symptoms and poorer mental well-being.
The use of cross-sectional data does not allow conclusions on causal relationships among variables.
Given the greater vulnerability of bisexual individuals to common mental health problems, evidence-based psychological interventions that strategically target their identity stress at multiple levels should be developed and made available to those in need. Social and psychoeducational interventions are also necessary to transform the monosexist culture and eradicate binegativity in the LGBT and wider communities.
尽管早期的研究表明,同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGB)个体比异性恋个体更容易出现精神症状,但对于 LGB 群体中的心理健康差异,尤其是在非西方社会,关注有限。本研究考察了男同性恋/女同性恋和双性恋个体之间在抑郁、焦虑和心理健康方面的差异,并探讨了双性恋个体比同性恋和女同性恋个体经历更大的性身份压力,这如何解释了他们之间的差异。
本研究的样本包括 931 名香港跨性别 LGB 个体,其中 70.1%为男同性恋/女同性恋,29.9%为双性恋。他们完成了一份关于性身份压力和心理健康的自我报告问卷。
双性恋个体表现出比女同性恋和男同性恋更高水平的抑郁和焦虑症状。结构方程模型显示,与女同性恋和男同性恋相比,双性恋个体更有可能报告身份不确定性、隐瞒性取向、与 LGBT 群体的联系较弱,而这些又与更强烈的情感症状和较差的心理健康相关。
使用横断面数据不允许对变量之间的因果关系做出结论。
鉴于双性恋个体更容易出现常见的心理健康问题,应该为他们制定和提供基于证据的心理干预措施,这些措施策略性地针对他们在多个层面的身份压力。还需要社会和心理教育干预措施来改变单一性别文化,消除 LGBT 和更广泛社区中的双性恋厌恶。