Arend Marc-Eric, Bruijns Stevan R
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;9(3):156-161. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Better access for clinicians from low- and middle-income countries to international conferences can improve collaborative opportunities and subsequently address the knowledge gap between the weaker and stronger knowledge economies. A better understanding of the cost of international conferences may help conference organisers improve access to their conferences. This study aimed to describe the expense-associated barriers to a selection of international emergency medicine and critical care conferences, in terms of registration cost and out-of-pocket expense.
A cross sectional, retrospective design was used. Registration cost variables (cost, waivers, discounts and scholarships) were collected from a cohort of international emergency medicine and critical care conferences held during 2016. The World Health Organization Purchasing Power Parity index was then applied to calculate an equitable registration cost for delegates from South Africa, Brazil, Turkey, China, Australia, Germany and the United States for each conference.
Twenty conferences were included. Eight conferences (36%) offered discounted rates, and another eight offered scholarships for low- and middle-income country delegates. Calculated, equitable registration rates were 2.6, 1.9, 1.9, 1.7, 0.9, 1.1 times lower than quoted respectively for South Africa, Brazil, Turkey, China, Australia and Germany compared to the rate in United States dollar. Only one conference provided equitable registration rates for all test-countries.
Current international conference registration costs (despite discounts, waivers and scholarships) are likely a barrier to including low- and middle-income delegates in the educational, networking and promotional opportunities that conferences provide. Conference organisers should consider restructuring registration costs to encourage more representative international audiences.
中低收入国家的临床医生有更多机会参加国际会议,这有助于增加合作机会,缩小知识经济较弱和较强国家之间的知识差距。更好地了解国际会议的成本,有助于会议组织者提高参会的机会。本研究旨在从注册费用和自付费用方面,描述一系列国际急诊医学和重症监护会议中与费用相关的障碍。
采用横断面回顾性设计。从2016年举办的一系列国际急诊医学和重症监护会议中收集注册费用变量(费用、豁免、折扣和奖学金)。然后应用世界卫生组织购买力平价指数,为来自南非、巴西、土耳其、中国、澳大利亚、德国和美国的代表计算每次会议的公平注册费用。
纳入了20次会议。8次会议(36%)提供了折扣率,另有8次会议为中低收入国家代表提供了奖学金。与以美元计算的美国注册率相比,计算得出的公平注册率分别比南非、巴西、土耳其、中国、澳大利亚和德国的报价低2.6、1.9、1.9、1.7、0.9、1.1倍。只有一次会议为所有测试国家提供了公平的注册率。
目前国际会议的注册费用(尽管有折扣、豁免和奖学金)可能是中低收入国家代表参与会议提供的教育、交流和推广机会的障碍。会议组织者应考虑调整注册费用结构,以吸引更具代表性的国际参会者。