SINTEF Ocean , Trondheim , Norway.
Cawthron Institute , Nelson , New Zealand.
Biofouling. 2019 Aug;35(7):805-817. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2019.1663413. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
To avoid the negative impacts caused by biofouling development, aquaculture nets around the world are periodically cleaned using high-pressure washers. Net cleaning is labour-intense and costly, can damage antifouling coatings on the nets, and pose contamination as well as fish health and welfare risks. To support the environmental sustainability of the growing aquaculture sector, novel net cleaning methods are needed. This study examined low-pressure-, cavitation-, and suction-based cleaning technologies as alternatives to conventional high-pressure cleaning. Using field experiments, cleaning efficacy, cleaning waste generation, and the impact of cleaning on coating integrity and net strength were evaluated. Cavitation and high-pressure cleaning achieved considerably higher cleaning efficacy than low-pressure and suction cleaning. However, a single high-pressure treatment caused up to 53% coating degradation, compared to 2% for cavitation. All technologies produced similar cleaning waste and neither reduced net strength significantly. This study identifies cavitation cleaning as promising technology for biofouling control on aquaculture nets.
为了避免生物污垢发展带来的负面影响,世界各地的水产养殖网定期使用高压清洗机进行清洗。网的清洗劳动强度大、成本高,可能会损坏网的防污涂层,并造成污染以及鱼类健康和福利风险。为了支持不断发展的水产养殖业的环境可持续性,需要开发新的网清洁方法。本研究考察了低压、空化和抽吸式清洁技术作为传统高压清洁的替代方法。通过现场实验,评估了清洁效果、清洁废物产生以及清洁对涂层完整性和网强度的影响。空化和高压清洁的清洁效果明显高于低压和抽吸清洁。然而,单次高压处理导致的涂层降解高达 53%,而空化处理的涂层降解仅为 2%。所有技术产生的清洁废物相似,并且都没有显著降低网的强度。本研究确定空化清洁是水产养殖网生物污垢控制的有前途的技术。