Suppr超能文献

各种复合材料与天然牙组织透明度的比较评估。

Comparative assessment of various composite materials and natural tooth tissue translucencies.

作者信息

Babina Ksenia, Turkina Anna, Sokhova Inna, Budina Tatiana, Makeeva Maria

出版信息

Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(4):406-419.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the translucency levels of various composite materials that are positioned by their manufacturers as 'dentin,' 'opaque,' 'body,' and 'enamel' in relation to natural tooth tissues.

METHODS

Sixteen commercial composite materials and 10 natural tooth tissue samples (enamel and dentin) were studied. The differences in color of dried and hydrated samples were measured on a black-and-white background using CIELab coordinates. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the translucency parameter (TP) values of the different materials (P < 0.05), and t test was used to compare the TP values for the dried and hydrated samples, with the significance set at P < 0.001.

RESULTS

The TP values of opaque shades for the studied composite materials ranged from 1.5 to 3.9, and those of enamel shades from 3.9 to 10.9. According to the obtained results, a body shade sample had a high level of translucency, comparable with some enamel shades of the materials studied (TP = 4.489 ± 0.505 after polymerization, and 3.916 ± 0.566 after 48 h of water storage). The translucency levels of dry composite samples and samples after hydration were not significantly different, while significant changes were observed for dentin and enamel (P < 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Choosing a composite material that is suitable for different clinical situations is a major challenge in everyday dental practice. Information about the relative translucency of various composites on the market and their compliance with natural tissues can help dentists to choose optimal restorative materials.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较不同制造商定位为“牙本质”“不透明”“主体”和“釉质”的各种复合材料相对于天然牙组织的半透明程度。

方法

研究了16种商用复合材料和10个天然牙组织样本(釉质和牙本质)。使用CIELab坐标在黑白背景上测量干燥和水合样本的颜色差异。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较不同材料的半透明参数(TP)值(P<0.05),并使用t检验比较干燥和水合样本的TP值,显著性设定为P<0.001。

结果

所研究复合材料的不透明色号的TP值范围为1.5至3.9,釉质色号的TP值范围为3.9至10.9。根据所得结果,一个主体色号样本具有较高的半透明程度,与所研究材料的一些釉质色号相当(聚合后TP=4.489±0.505,储水48小时后TP=3.916±0.566)。干燥复合材料样本和水合后样本的半透明程度没有显著差异,而牙本质和釉质则观察到显著变化(P<0.05)。

意义

选择适合不同临床情况的复合材料是日常牙科实践中的一项重大挑战。有关市场上各种复合材料的相对半透明程度及其与天然组织的匹配情况的信息可以帮助牙医选择最佳的修复材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验