Suppr超能文献

检测认知储备的神话:静态和动态认知储备指数是否代表不同的储备仓库?

Testing for the Myth of Cognitive Reserve: Are the Static and Dynamic Cognitive Reserve Indexes a Representation of Different Reserve Warehouses?

机构信息

Neuroimaging Laboratory, Santa Lucia Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Laboratory of Experimental and Behavioural Neurophysiology, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;72(1):111-126. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190716.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive reserve (CR) explains the individual resilience to neurodegeneration. Years of formal education express the static measure of reserve (sCR). A dynamic aspect of CR (dCR) has been recently proposed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare sCR and dCR indexes, respectively, to detect brain abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients.

METHODS

117 individuals [39 AD, 40 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 38 healthy subjects (HS)] underwent neuropsychological evaluation and a 3T-MRI. T1-weighted volumes were used for manual segmentation of the hippocampus and of the parahippocampal cortices. Years of formal education were used as an index of sCR. Partial Least Square analysis was used to decompose the variance of individual MMSE scores, considered as a dCR index. In aMCI and AD patients, the brain abnormalities have been assessed comparing individuals with high and low levels of sCR and dCR in turn. Moreover, we investigated the effect of the different CR indexes in mediating the relationship between changes in brain volumes and memory performances.

RESULTS

sCR and dCR indexes classified differently individuals having high or low levels of CR. Smaller hippocampal and parahippocampal volumes in high dCR patients were found. The sCR and dCR indexes mediated significantly the relationship between brain abnormalities and memory in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CR mediated the relationship between brain and memory dysfunctions. We hypothesized that sCR and dCR indexes are a representation of different warehouses of reserve not operating in parallel but forming a complex system, in which crystalized cognitive abilities and actual cognitive efficiency interact with brain atrophy impacting on memory.

摘要

背景

认知储备(CR)解释了个体对神经退行性变的适应能力。受教育年限反映了储备的静态指标(sCR)。最近提出了 CR 的动态方面(dCR)。

目的

本研究旨在比较 sCR 和 dCR 指标,以分别检测阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的脑异常。

方法

117 名个体[39 名 AD、40 名遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)、38 名健康对照者(HS)]接受神经心理学评估和 3T-MRI。使用 T1 加权体积对海马体和海马旁皮质进行手动分割。受教育年限用作 sCR 的指标。偏最小二乘分析用于分解个体 MMSE 评分的方差,该评分被视为 dCR 指标。在 aMCI 和 AD 患者中,依次比较具有高 sCR 和 dCR 水平的个体,评估脑异常。此外,我们还研究了不同 CR 指标在介导脑体积变化与记忆表现之间关系中的作用。

结果

sCR 和 dCR 指标以不同的方式对具有高或低 CR 水平的个体进行分类。在高 dCR 患者中,发现海马体和海马旁皮质体积较小。sCR 和 dCR 指标显著介导了患者脑异常与记忆之间的关系。

结论

CR 介导了脑与记忆功能障碍之间的关系。我们假设 sCR 和 dCR 指标代表不同的储备仓库,它们不是并行运作,而是形成一个复杂的系统,其中晶体认知能力和实际认知效率与脑萎缩相互作用,影响记忆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验