• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Collaborative Dementia Care via Telephone and Internet on Quality of Life, Caregiver Well-being, and Health Care Use: The Care Ecosystem Randomized Clinical Trial.电话和互联网协作式痴呆护理对生活质量、照顾者幸福感和医疗保健利用的影响:护理生态系统随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1658-1667. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4101.
2
Care Ecosystem Collaborative Model and Health Care Costs in Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.Care Ecosystem 协作模式与痴呆 Medicare 受益人的医疗保健费用:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Nov 1;183(11):1222-1228. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.4764.
3
Life-space mobility in dementia patients and family caregivers: A dyadic approach.痴呆患者及其家庭照顾者的生活空间流动性:一种对偶方法。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Dec;15(4):e12341. doi: 10.1111/opn.12341. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
4
Predictors of self- and caregiver-rated quality of life for people with dementia living in the community and in nursing homes in northern Taiwan.预测居住在台湾北部社区和养老院的痴呆症患者的自我和护理人员生活质量。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 May;27(5):825-36. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002506. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
5
Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Collaborative Dementia Care: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.协作式痴呆护理的临床结局和成本效益:一项集群随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2419282. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19282.
6
Caregiver burden, mental health, quality of life and self-efficacy of family caregivers of persons with dementia in Malaysia: baseline results of a psychoeducational intervention study.马来西亚痴呆症患者照顾者的负担、心理健康、生活质量和自我效能感:一项心理教育干预研究的基线结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05221-9.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of Dementia Care Management in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.初级保健中痴呆症护理管理的有效性和安全性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):996-1004. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2124.
8
[Effects of Multicomponent Case Management on the Problem Behaviors of Patients With Dementia and Family Caregivers' Distress, Self-Efficacy, Depression, Burden and Health Promotion Behaviors].[多组分病例管理对痴呆患者问题行为及家庭照顾者困扰、自我效能感、抑郁、负担和健康促进行为的影响]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2022 Oct;69(5):68-85. doi: 10.6224/JN.202210_69(5).09.
9
Effects of a Telehealth Early Palliative Care Intervention for Family Caregivers of Persons With Advanced Heart Failure: The ENABLE CHF-PC Randomized Clinical Trial.远程医疗早期姑息治疗对晚期心力衰竭患者家属的影响:ENABLE CHF-PC 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202583. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2583.
10
Activities of daily living function and neuropsychiatric symptoms of people with dementia and caregiver burden: The mediating role of caregiving hours.日常生活活动功能与痴呆患者的神经精神症状和照护者负担:照护时间的中介作用。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Mar-Apr;81:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and Caregiver Outcomes of Health System, Community-Based, and Usual Dementia Care: A Prespecified Analysis of the Dementia Care Study (D-CARE) Randomized Clinical Trial.卫生系统、社区及常规痴呆症护理的患者及照护者结局:痴呆症护理研究(D-CARE)随机临床试验的预设分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.4247.
2
The real-time experiences of older people with dementia, informal caregivers and professional caregivers during the transition from home to a nursing home: multiple longitudinal cases.老年人痴呆症患者、非正式照料者和专业照料者在从家庭过渡到养老院期间的实时体验:多个纵向案例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):1134. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13113-w.
3
Race and Ethnicity and Comorbidities Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Young-Onset Dementia.患有早发性痴呆症的医疗保险受益人的种族、民族与合并症
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2528001. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28001.
4
Clinical nurses' behavioral intentions to manage cancer-related cognitive impairment in colorectal cancer patients based on the theory of planned behavior: a qualitative study.基于计划行为理论的临床护士对结直肠癌患者癌症相关认知障碍管理的行为意向:一项定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 4;24(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03515-w.
5
Digital Health Literacy and Physical Activity Programme for Improvement of Quality of Life in Caregivers of People with Dementia (CAREFIT): Study Protocol.改善痴呆症患者照料者生活质量的数字健康素养与身体活动计划(CAREFIT):研究方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 22;13(11):1219. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111219.
6
A systematic review of the effectiveness of technological interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: effects on quality of life and psychoemotional variables.对痴呆症患者照料者的技术干预效果的系统评价:对生活质量和心理情绪变量的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1579239. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1579239. eCollection 2025.
7
Program of intensive support in emergency departments for care partners of cognitively impaired patients: A randomized controlled trial.急诊科针对认知障碍患者护理伙伴的强化支持项目:一项随机对照试验。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 May;21(5):e70306. doi: 10.1002/alz.70306.
8
Improving Early Dementia Detection Among Diverse Older Adults With Cognitive Concerns With the 5-Cog Paradigm: Protocol for a Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Clinical Trial.采用5认知范式改善有认知问题的不同老年人群体的早期痴呆症检测:一项混合有效性-实施临床试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 3;14:e60471. doi: 10.2196/60471.
9
Assessment of Health System Readiness and Quality of Dementia Services in Peru: Protocol for a Qualitative Study With Stakeholder Interviews and Documentation Review.秘鲁卫生系统对痴呆症服务的准备情况及质量评估:一项包含利益相关者访谈和文件审查的定性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 21;14:e60296. doi: 10.2196/60296.
10
Randomized clinical trial of the individualized coordination and empowerment for care partners of persons with dementia (ICECaP) intervention: impact on preparedness for caregiving.痴呆症患者护理伙伴个性化协调与赋权(ICECaP)干预的随机临床试验:对护理准备的影响
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Mar 1;37(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-02959-z.

电话和互联网协作式痴呆护理对生活质量、照顾者幸福感和医疗保健利用的影响:护理生态系统随机临床试验。

Effect of Collaborative Dementia Care via Telephone and Internet on Quality of Life, Caregiver Well-being, and Health Care Use: The Care Ecosystem Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco.

Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1658-1667. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4101.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4101
PMID:31566651
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6777227/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Few health systems have adopted effective dementia care management programs. The Care Ecosystem is a model for delivering care from centralized hubs across broad geographic areas to caregivers and persons with dementia (PWDs) independently of their health system affiliations.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the Care Ecosystem is effective in improving outcomes important to PWDs, their caregivers, and payers beyond those achieved with usual care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial with a pragmatic design was conducted among PWDs and their caregivers. Each PWD-caregiver dyad was enrolled for 12 months between March 20, 2015, and February 28, 2017. Data were collected until March 5, 2018. Study interventions and assessments were administered over the telephone and internet by clinical and research teams in San Francisco, California, and Omaha, Nebraska. Of 2585 referred or volunteer PWD-caregiver dyads in California, Iowa, or Nebraska, 780 met eligibility criteria and were enrolled. A total of 512 PWD-caregiver dyads were randomized to receive care through the Care Ecosystem and 268 dyads to receive usual care. All eligible PWDs had a dementia diagnosis; were enrolled or eligible for enrollment in Medicare or Medicaid; and spoke English, Spanish, or Cantonese. Analyses were intention-to-treat.

INTERVENTION

Telephone-based collaborative dementia care was delivered by a trained care team navigator, who provided education, support and care coordination with a team of dementia specialists (advanced practice nurse, social worker, and pharmacist).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcome measure: Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease based on caregiver's rating of 13 aspects of PWD's well-being (including physical health, energy level, mood, living situation, memory, relationships, and finances) on a 4-point scale (poor to excellent). Secondary outcomes: frequencies of PWDs' use of emergency department, hospitalization, and ambulance services; caregiver depression (score on 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire; higher scores indicate more severe depression); and caregiver burden (score on 12-Item Zarit Burden Interview; higher scores indicate more severe caregiver burden).

RESULTS

The 780 PWDs (56.3% female; mean [SD] age, 78.1 [9.9] years) and 780 caregivers (70.9% female; mean [SD] age, 64.7 [12.0] years) lived in California (n = 452), Nebraska (n = 284), or Iowa (n = 44). Of 780 dyads, 655 were still active at 12 months, and 571 completed the 12-month survey. Compared with usual care, the Care Ecosystem improved PWD quality of life (B, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25-1.30; P = .04), reduced emergency department visits (B, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.01; P = .04), and decreased caregiver depression (B, -1.14; 95% CI, -2.15 to -0.13; P = .03) and caregiver burden (B, -1.90; 95% CI, -3.89 to -0.08; P = .046).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Effective care management for dementia can be delivered from centralized hubs to supplement usual care and mitigate the growing societal and economic burdens of dementia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02213458.

摘要

重要性: 很少有卫生系统采用有效的痴呆症护理管理计划。护理生态系统是一种从集中枢纽向广泛地理区域的护理人员和痴呆症患者(PWD)提供护理的模式,无论他们的健康系统隶属关系如何。

目的: 确定护理生态系统是否能有效改善 PWD 及其护理人员和付款人的预后,超出常规护理的预后。

设计、地点和参与者: 一项采用实用设计的单盲、随机临床试验,参与者为 PWD 及其护理人员。每个 PWD-护理人员二人组在 2015 年 3 月 20 日至 2017 年 2 月 28 日之间被纳入 12 个月的研究。数据收集截止到 2018 年 3 月 5 日。研究干预措施和评估由加利福尼亚州旧金山和内布拉斯加州奥马哈的临床和研究团队通过电话和互联网进行。在加利福尼亚州、爱荷华州或内布拉斯加州,有 2585 名被推荐或自愿的 PWD-护理人员二人组,其中 780 名符合入选标准并被纳入。共有 512 对 PWD-护理人员二人组被随机分配接受护理生态系统的护理,268 对接受常规护理。所有符合条件的 PWD 都有痴呆症诊断;参加或有资格参加医疗保险或医疗补助;并且会说英语、西班牙语或粤语。分析为意向治疗。

干预措施: 通过经过培训的护理团队导航员提供电话为基础的协作式痴呆症护理,提供教育、支持和护理协调,与一组痴呆症专家(高级实践护士、社会工作者和药剂师)合作。

主要结果和测量: 主要结局测量:基于护理人员对 PWD 福祉的 13 个方面(包括身体健康、能量水平、情绪、生活状况、记忆、人际关系和财务状况)的评分的阿尔茨海默病生活质量,评分从 4 点(差到优秀)。次要结局:PWD 急诊、住院和救护车服务的使用频率;护理人员的抑郁情况(使用 9 项患者健康问卷进行评分;分数越高表示抑郁越严重);护理人员的负担(使用 12 项 Zarit 负担访谈进行评分;分数越高表示护理人员的负担越重)。

结果: 780 名 PWD(56.3%女性;平均[SD]年龄,78.1[9.9]岁)和 780 名护理人员(70.9%女性;平均[SD]年龄,64.7[12.0]岁)居住在加利福尼亚州(n=452)、内布拉斯加州(n=284)或爱荷华州(n=44)。在 780 对二人组中,有 655 对在 12 个月时仍活跃,有 571 对完成了 12 个月的调查。与常规护理相比,护理生态系统改善了 PWD 的生活质量(B,0.53;95%CI,0.25-1.30;P=0.04),减少了急诊就诊(B,-0.14;95%CI,-0.29 至 -0.01;P=0.04),并降低了护理人员的抑郁(B,-1.14;95%CI,-2.15 至 -0.13;P=0.03)和护理人员的负担(B,-1.90;95%CI,-3.89 至 -0.08;P=0.046)。

结论和相关性: 有效的痴呆症护理管理可以从集中枢纽提供,以补充常规护理,并减轻痴呆症给社会和经济带来的日益增长的负担。

试验注册: ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02213458。