Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1658-1667. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4101.
Few health systems have adopted effective dementia care management programs. The Care Ecosystem is a model for delivering care from centralized hubs across broad geographic areas to caregivers and persons with dementia (PWDs) independently of their health system affiliations.
To determine whether the Care Ecosystem is effective in improving outcomes important to PWDs, their caregivers, and payers beyond those achieved with usual care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial with a pragmatic design was conducted among PWDs and their caregivers. Each PWD-caregiver dyad was enrolled for 12 months between March 20, 2015, and February 28, 2017. Data were collected until March 5, 2018. Study interventions and assessments were administered over the telephone and internet by clinical and research teams in San Francisco, California, and Omaha, Nebraska. Of 2585 referred or volunteer PWD-caregiver dyads in California, Iowa, or Nebraska, 780 met eligibility criteria and were enrolled. A total of 512 PWD-caregiver dyads were randomized to receive care through the Care Ecosystem and 268 dyads to receive usual care. All eligible PWDs had a dementia diagnosis; were enrolled or eligible for enrollment in Medicare or Medicaid; and spoke English, Spanish, or Cantonese. Analyses were intention-to-treat.
Telephone-based collaborative dementia care was delivered by a trained care team navigator, who provided education, support and care coordination with a team of dementia specialists (advanced practice nurse, social worker, and pharmacist).
Primary outcome measure: Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease based on caregiver's rating of 13 aspects of PWD's well-being (including physical health, energy level, mood, living situation, memory, relationships, and finances) on a 4-point scale (poor to excellent). Secondary outcomes: frequencies of PWDs' use of emergency department, hospitalization, and ambulance services; caregiver depression (score on 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire; higher scores indicate more severe depression); and caregiver burden (score on 12-Item Zarit Burden Interview; higher scores indicate more severe caregiver burden).
The 780 PWDs (56.3% female; mean [SD] age, 78.1 [9.9] years) and 780 caregivers (70.9% female; mean [SD] age, 64.7 [12.0] years) lived in California (n = 452), Nebraska (n = 284), or Iowa (n = 44). Of 780 dyads, 655 were still active at 12 months, and 571 completed the 12-month survey. Compared with usual care, the Care Ecosystem improved PWD quality of life (B, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25-1.30; P = .04), reduced emergency department visits (B, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.01; P = .04), and decreased caregiver depression (B, -1.14; 95% CI, -2.15 to -0.13; P = .03) and caregiver burden (B, -1.90; 95% CI, -3.89 to -0.08; P = .046).
Effective care management for dementia can be delivered from centralized hubs to supplement usual care and mitigate the growing societal and economic burdens of dementia.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02213458.
重要性: 很少有卫生系统采用有效的痴呆症护理管理计划。护理生态系统是一种从集中枢纽向广泛地理区域的护理人员和痴呆症患者(PWD)提供护理的模式,无论他们的健康系统隶属关系如何。
目的: 确定护理生态系统是否能有效改善 PWD 及其护理人员和付款人的预后,超出常规护理的预后。
设计、地点和参与者: 一项采用实用设计的单盲、随机临床试验,参与者为 PWD 及其护理人员。每个 PWD-护理人员二人组在 2015 年 3 月 20 日至 2017 年 2 月 28 日之间被纳入 12 个月的研究。数据收集截止到 2018 年 3 月 5 日。研究干预措施和评估由加利福尼亚州旧金山和内布拉斯加州奥马哈的临床和研究团队通过电话和互联网进行。在加利福尼亚州、爱荷华州或内布拉斯加州,有 2585 名被推荐或自愿的 PWD-护理人员二人组,其中 780 名符合入选标准并被纳入。共有 512 对 PWD-护理人员二人组被随机分配接受护理生态系统的护理,268 对接受常规护理。所有符合条件的 PWD 都有痴呆症诊断;参加或有资格参加医疗保险或医疗补助;并且会说英语、西班牙语或粤语。分析为意向治疗。
干预措施: 通过经过培训的护理团队导航员提供电话为基础的协作式痴呆症护理,提供教育、支持和护理协调,与一组痴呆症专家(高级实践护士、社会工作者和药剂师)合作。
主要结果和测量: 主要结局测量:基于护理人员对 PWD 福祉的 13 个方面(包括身体健康、能量水平、情绪、生活状况、记忆、人际关系和财务状况)的评分的阿尔茨海默病生活质量,评分从 4 点(差到优秀)。次要结局:PWD 急诊、住院和救护车服务的使用频率;护理人员的抑郁情况(使用 9 项患者健康问卷进行评分;分数越高表示抑郁越严重);护理人员的负担(使用 12 项 Zarit 负担访谈进行评分;分数越高表示护理人员的负担越重)。
结果: 780 名 PWD(56.3%女性;平均[SD]年龄,78.1[9.9]岁)和 780 名护理人员(70.9%女性;平均[SD]年龄,64.7[12.0]岁)居住在加利福尼亚州(n=452)、内布拉斯加州(n=284)或爱荷华州(n=44)。在 780 对二人组中,有 655 对在 12 个月时仍活跃,有 571 对完成了 12 个月的调查。与常规护理相比,护理生态系统改善了 PWD 的生活质量(B,0.53;95%CI,0.25-1.30;P=0.04),减少了急诊就诊(B,-0.14;95%CI,-0.29 至 -0.01;P=0.04),并降低了护理人员的抑郁(B,-1.14;95%CI,-2.15 至 -0.13;P=0.03)和护理人员的负担(B,-1.90;95%CI,-3.89 至 -0.08;P=0.046)。
结论和相关性: 有效的痴呆症护理管理可以从集中枢纽提供,以补充常规护理,并减轻痴呆症给社会和经济带来的日益增长的负担。
试验注册: ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02213458。