Suppr超能文献

胆囊炎急诊入院的结局:一项全国性队列研究。

Outcomes Following an Index Emergency Admission With Cholecystitis: A National Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.

Trent Oesophago-Gastric Unit, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):367-374. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003599.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences between patients who undergo cholecystectomy following index admission for cholecystitis, and those who are managed nonoperatively.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Index emergency cholecystectomy following acute cholecystitis is widely recommended by national guidelines, but its effect on clinical outcomes remains uncertain.

METHODS

Data collected routinely from the Hospital Episode Statistics database (all admissions to National Health Service organizations in England and Wales) were extracted between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2015. Analyses were limited to patients aged over 18 years with a primary diagnosis of cholecystitis. Exclusions included records with missing or invalid datasets, patients who had previously undergone a cholecystectomy, patients who had died without a cholecystectomy, and those undergoing cholecystectomy for malignancy, pancreatitis, or choledocholithiasis. Patients were grouped as either "no cholecystectomy" where they had never undergone a cholecystectomy following discharge, or "cholecystectomy." The latter group was then subdivided as "emergency cholecystectomy" when cholecystectomy was performed during their index emergency admission, or "interval cholecystectomy" when a cholecystectomy was performed within 12 months following a subsequent (emergency or elective) admission. Propensity Score Matching was used to match emergency and interval cholecystectomy groups. Main outcome measures included 1) One-year total length of hospital stay due to biliary causes following an index emergency admission with cholecystitis. 2) One-year mortality; defined as death occurring within 1 year following the index emergency admission with acute cholecystitis.

RESULTS

Of the 99,139 patients admitted as an emergency with acute cholecystitis, 51.1% (47,626) did not undergo a cholecystectomy within 1 year of index admission. These patients were older, with more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Score ≥ 5 in 23.5% vs. 8.1%, P < 0.001) when compared to patients who did have a cholecystectomy. While all-cause 1-year mortality was higher in the nonoperated versus the operated group (12.2% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.001), gallbladder-related deaths were significantly lower than all other causes of death in the non-operated group (3.3% vs. 8.9%, P < 0.001). Following matching, 1-year total hospital admission time was significantly higher following emergency compared with interval cholecystectomy (17.7 d vs. 13 d, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 50% of patients in England did not undergo cholecystectomy following index admission for acute cholecystitis. Mortality was higher in the nonoperated group, which was mostly due to non-gallbladder pathologies but total hospital admission time for biliary causes was lower over 12 months. Increasing the numbers of emergency cholecystectomy may risk over-treating patients with acute cholecystitis and increasing their time spent admitted to hospital.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估胆囊炎初次入院后行胆囊切除术的患者与非手术治疗患者之间的差异。

背景资料概要

国家指南广泛推荐在急性胆囊炎初次就诊时行急诊胆囊切除术,但该方法对临床结局的影响仍不确定。

方法

从 2002 年 4 月 1 日至 2015 年 3 月 31 日,从医院住院统计数据库(英格兰和威尔士所有国民保健服务机构的住院患者)中提取常规收集的数据。分析仅限于年龄在 18 岁以上、初次诊断为胆囊炎的患者。排除标准包括记录缺失或无效数据集、既往已行胆囊切除术、未行胆囊切除术即死亡、以及因恶性肿瘤、胰腺炎或胆管结石而行胆囊切除术的患者。患者分为“未行胆囊切除术”,即出院后从未行胆囊切除术,或“行胆囊切除术”。后者进一步分为“急诊胆囊切除术”,即胆囊炎初次就诊时行胆囊切除术,或“择期胆囊切除术”,即随后(急诊或择期)住院 12 个月内行胆囊切除术。采用倾向评分匹配法匹配急诊和择期胆囊切除术组。主要观察指标包括:1)胆囊炎初次就诊行急诊胆囊切除术患者的胆道相关 1 年总住院时间。2)1 年死亡率;定义为胆囊炎初次就诊后 1 年内死亡。

结果

在 99139 例因急性胆囊炎行急诊入院的患者中,51.1%(47626 例)在初次入院后 1 年内未行胆囊切除术。与行胆囊切除术的患者相比,这些患者年龄更大,合并症更多(Charlson 合并症评分≥5 的占 23.5%,vs. 8.1%,P<0.001)。与手术组相比,未手术组的全因 1 年死亡率更高(12.2% vs. 2.0%,P<0.001),但非手术组的胆囊相关死亡率明显低于其他所有死因(3.3% vs. 8.9%,P<0.001)。匹配后,急诊组与择期组相比,胆道相关 1 年总住院时间明显延长(17.7d vs. 13d,P<0.001)。

结论

在英格兰,超过 50%的急性胆囊炎初次就诊患者未行胆囊切除术。未手术组死亡率更高,主要是由于非胆囊疾病所致,但 12 个月内胆道相关的总住院时间较低。增加急诊胆囊切除术的数量可能会使更多的急性胆囊炎患者面临过度治疗的风险,并增加他们的住院时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验