Departments of Neurosurgery.
Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;33(2):147-153. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000642.
Although mechanical thrombectomy has become the standard of care for large-vessel occlusion, the role of conscious sedation versus general anesthesia (GA) with intubation during thrombectomy remains controversial. Aphasia may increase patient agitation or apparent uncooperativeness/confusion and thereby lead to higher use of GA. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for GA and determine if the side of vessel occlusion potentially impacts GA rates.
Patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) for acute ischemic stroke at our institution between April 2014 and July 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, procedural factors, and outcomes were assessed using multivariate regression analyses. Mediation analysis was utilized to investigate whether aphasia lies on the causal pathway between left-sided MCA stroke and GA.
Overall, 112 patients were included: 62 with left-sided and 50 with right-sided MCA occlusion. Patients with left-sided MCA occlusion presented with aphasia significantly more often those with right-sided occlusion (90.3% vs. 32.0%; P<0.001). GA rates were significantly higher for patients with left-sided compared with right-sided MCA occlusion (45.2% vs. 20.0%; P=0.028). Aphasia mediated 91.3% of the effect of MCA stroke laterality on GA (P=0.02). GA was associated with increased door-to-groin-puncture time (106.4% increase; 95% confidence interval, 24.1%-243.4%; P=0.006) and adverse discharge outcome (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07; P=0.019).
Patients who had a stroke with left-sided MCA occlusion are more likely to undergo GA for mechanical thrombectomy than those with right-sided MCA occlusion. Aphasia may mediate this effect and understanding this relationship may decrease GA rates through modification of management protocols, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes. Our study suggests that GA should preferentially be considered for the subset of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for left-sided MCA occlusion.
尽管机械取栓已成为大血管闭塞的标准治疗方法,但在取栓过程中使用镇静与全身麻醉(GA)插管的作用仍存在争议。失语症可能会增加患者的激动或明显的不合作/困惑,从而导致更多地使用 GA。本研究的目的是确定 GA 的危险因素,并确定血管闭塞的侧别是否会影响 GA 率。
回顾性分析了 2014 年 4 月至 2017 年 7 月期间在我院接受大脑中动脉(MCA)机械取栓治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者。使用多变量回归分析评估患者特征、手术因素和结局。采用中介分析来研究失语症是否位于左侧 MCA 卒中与 GA 之间的因果路径上。
共有 112 例患者入组:62 例左侧 MCA 闭塞,50 例右侧 MCA 闭塞。左侧 MCA 闭塞患者发生失语症的比例明显高于右侧 MCA 闭塞患者(90.3% vs. 32.0%;P<0.001)。左侧 MCA 闭塞患者 GA 率明显高于右侧 MCA 闭塞患者(45.2% vs. 20.0%;P=0.028)。失语症介导了 MCA 卒中侧别的 91.3%对 GA 的影响(P=0.02)。GA 与门到股动脉穿刺时间延长(增加 106.4%;95%置信区间,24.1%-243.4%;P=0.006)和不良出院结局相关(比值比,1.04;95%置信区间,1.01-1.07;P=0.019)。
左侧 MCA 闭塞患者发生卒中比右侧 MCA 闭塞患者更有可能接受 GA 进行机械取栓。失语症可能介导了这种影响,通过修改管理方案来理解这种关系可能会降低 GA 率,从而改善临床结局。我们的研究表明,对于接受左侧 MCA 闭塞机械取栓治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者,应优先考虑 GA。