MRI Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, CIBERSAM G21, Barcelona, Spain.
Brain Behav. 2019 Oct;9(10):e01427. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1427. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
Audiovisual educational tools have increasingly been used during the past years to complement and compete with traditional textbooks. However, little is known as to how the brain processes didactic information presented in different formats. We directly assessed brain activity during learning using both traditional textbook and audiovisual-3D material.
A homogeneous sample of 30 young adults with active study habits was assessed. Educational material on the subject of Cardiology was adapted to be presented during the acquisition of functional MRI.
When tested after image acquisition, participants obtained similar examination scores for both formats. Evoked brain activity was robust during both traditional textbook and audiovisual-3D lessons, but a greater number of brain systems were implicated in the processing of audiovisual-3D information, consistent with its multisource sensory nature. However, learning was not associated with group mean brain activations, but was instead predicted by distinct functional MRI signal changes in the frontal lobes and showed distinct cognitive correlates. In the audiovisual-3D version, examination scores were positively correlated with late-evoked prefrontal cortex activity and working memory, and negatively correlated with language-related frontal areas and verbal memory. As for the traditional textbook version, the fewer results obtained suggested the opposite pattern, with examination scores negatively correlating with prefrontal cortex activity evoked during the lesson.
Overall, the results indicate that a similar level of knowledge may be achieved via different cognitive strategies. In our experiment, audiovisual learning appeared to benefit from prefrontal executive resources (as opposed to memorizing verbal information) more than traditional textbook learning.
在过去的几年中,视听教育工具越来越多地被用于补充和竞争传统教科书。然而,人们对大脑如何处理以不同格式呈现的教学信息知之甚少。我们使用传统教科书和视听 3D 材料直接评估学习过程中的大脑活动。
评估了 30 名具有积极学习习惯的年轻成年人的同质样本。适应主题为心脏病学的教育材料,以便在获取功能磁共振成像期间呈现。
在图像采集后进行测试时,两种格式的参与者获得了相似的考试成绩。在传统教科书和视听 3D 课程中,诱发的大脑活动都很强烈,但处理视听 3D 信息需要更多的大脑系统参与,这与其多源感觉性质一致。然而,学习与组平均大脑激活无关,而是由额叶中的特定功能磁共振成像信号变化预测,并表现出不同的认知相关性。在视听 3D 版本中,考试成绩与前额叶皮质的后期诱发活动和工作记忆呈正相关,与与语言相关的额叶区域和言语记忆呈负相关。对于传统教科书版本,获得的结果较少表明相反的模式,考试成绩与课程期间诱发的前额叶皮质活动呈负相关。
总的来说,结果表明可以通过不同的认知策略达到相似的知识水平。在我们的实验中,视听学习似乎比传统教科书学习更受益于前额叶执行资源(而不是记忆言语信息)。