Veulemans Verena, Polzin Amin, Maier Oliver, Klein Kathrin, Wolff Georg, Hellhammer Katharina, Afzal Shazia, Piayda Kerstin, Jung Christian, Westenfeld Ralf, Blehm Alexander, Lichtenberg Artur, Kelm Malte, Zeus Tobias
Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 8;8(10):1642. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101642.
In-depth knowledge about potential predictors of mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is still warranted. Currently used risk stratification models for TAVR often fail to reach a holistic approach. We, therefore, aimed to create a new staged risk model for 1-year mortality including several new categories including (a) AS-entities (b) cardiopulmonary hemodynamics (c) comorbidities, and (d) different access routes.
737 transfemoral (TF) TAVR (84.3%) and 137 transapical (TA) TAVR (15.7%) patients were included. Predictors of 1-year mortality were assessed according to the aforementioned categories.
Over-all 1-year mortality ( = 100, 11.4%) was significantly higher in the TA TAVR group (TF vs. TA TAVR: 10.0% vs. 18.9 %; = 0.0050*). By multivariate cox-regression analysis, a three-staged model was created in patients with fulfilled categories (TF TAVR: = 655, 88,9%; TA TAVR: = 117, 85.4%). Patients in "stage 2" showed 1.7-fold (HR 1.67; CI 1.07-2.60; = 0.024*) and patients in "stage 3" 3.5-fold (HR 3.45; CI 1.97-6.05; < 0.0001*) enhanced risk to die within 1 year. Mortality increased with every stage and reached the highest rates of 42.5% in "stage 3" ( < 0.0001*), even when old- and new-generation devices ( = n.s) were sub-specified.
This new staged mortality risk model had incremental value for prediction of 1-year mortality after TAVR independently from the TAVR-era.
对于经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中死亡的潜在预测因素仍需深入了解。目前用于TAVR的风险分层模型往往未能采用整体方法。因此,我们旨在创建一个新的1年死亡率分期风险模型,纳入几个新类别,包括(a)主动脉瓣狭窄实体(b)心肺血流动力学(c)合并症,以及(d)不同的入路途径。
纳入737例经股动脉(TF)TAVR患者(84.3%)和137例经心尖(TA)TAVR患者(15.7%)。根据上述类别评估1年死亡率的预测因素。
TA TAVR组的总体1年死亡率(n = 100,11.4%)显著高于TF TAVR组(TF与TA TAVR:10.0%对18.9%;P = 0.0050*)。通过多变量Cox回归分析,在符合条件的患者中创建了一个三阶段模型(TF TAVR:n = 655,88.9%;TA TAVR:n = 117,85.4%)。“2期”患者死亡风险增加1.7倍(HR 1.67;CI 1.07 - 2.60;P = 0.024*),“3期”患者死亡风险增加3.5倍(HR 3.45;CI 1.97 - 6.05;P < 0.0001*),即在1年内死亡风险增加。死亡率随每个阶段增加,在“3期”达到最高42.5%(P < 0.0001*),即使对新一代和旧一代器械进行细分时也是如此(P = 无显著差异)。
这个新的分期死亡风险模型对于预测TAVR术后1年死亡率具有增量价值,且独立于TAVR时代。