Fordham University.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2020 Jun;57(2):119-128. doi: 10.1037/pst0000254. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
Amid increases in electronic health record adoption, many psychotherapists are concerned that in-session computing may harm the client-provider relationship, also known as the therapeutic alliance. The emerging practice of collaborative documentation (CD) is one strategy designed to prevent this outcome. Little empirical work has examined the effects of in-session computing generally or CD specifically within the psychotherapeutic context. This study explores how CD is being implemented in psychotherapy and examines how both the frequency of computing and the use of CD affects the therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapists in this study engaged in an average of 42 (SD = 38.5) computing episodes. CD was present in 39% of sessions (N = 21). Regression models found that among providers, increases in computing frequency predicted decreases in alliance (ß = -.18, p < .05). Conversely, among clients, the use of CD improved alliance (ß = .43, p < .01). Findings suggest that psychotherapists use computers often, but parties view the effect of electronic health records differently. Reconciling this disparity and continuing to develop effective technology-based best practices is imperative. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
在电子健康记录采用率不断提高的背景下,许多心理治疗师担心会话中的计算可能会损害医患关系,也称为治疗联盟。新兴的协作文档记录(CD)实践是旨在防止这种结果的策略之一。很少有实证研究考察过会话中计算的一般影响或 CD 对心理治疗背景下的治疗联盟的具体影响。本研究探讨了 CD 如何在心理治疗中实施,并研究了计算的频率和 CD 的使用如何影响治疗联盟。本研究中的心理治疗师平均进行了 42 次(SD = 38.5)计算。39%的治疗会话中存在 CD(N = 21)。回归模型发现,在提供者中,计算频率的增加预示着联盟的下降(ß= -.18,p<.05)。相反,在客户中,使用 CD 可以改善联盟(ß=.43,p<.01)。研究结果表明,心理治疗师经常使用计算机,但各方对电子健康记录的看法不同。弥合这一差距并继续制定有效的基于技术的最佳实践是当务之急。