Suppr超能文献

臀中肌在腰痛患者和无腰痛患者中的功能:一项系统评价。

Gluteus medius muscle function in people with and without low back pain: a systematic review.

机构信息

Discipline of Podiatry, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia.

Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 22;20(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2833-4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Globally, low back pain (LBP) is one of the greatest causes of disability. In people with LBP, dysfunction of muscles such as the gluteus medius have been demonstrated to increase spinal loading and reduce spinal stability. Differences in gluteus medius function have been reported in those with LBP compared to those without, although this has only been reported in individual studies. The aim of this systematic review was to determine if adults with a history, or current LBP, demonstrate differences in measures of gluteus medius function when compared to adults without LBP.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, PubMED, Pro Quest Database, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception until December 2018 for published journal articles and conference abstracts. No language restrictions were applied. Only case-control studies with participants 18 years and over were included. Participants could have had any type and duration of LBP. Studies could have assessed gluteus medius function with any quantifiable clinical assessment or measurement tool, with the participant non-weight bearing or weight bearing, and during static or dynamic activity. Quality appraisal and data extraction were independently performed by two authors.

RESULTS

The 24 included articles involved 1088 participants with LBP and 998 without LBP. The gluteus medius muscle in participants with LBP tended to demonstrate reduced strength and more trigger points compared to the gluteus medius muscle of those without LBP. The level of activity, fatigability, time to activate, time to peak activation, cross sectional area, and muscle thickness showed unclear results. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of included studies.

CONCLUSION

Clinically, the findings from this systematic review should be considered when assessing and managing patients with LBP. Future studies that clearly define the type and duration of LBP, and prospectively assess gluteus medius muscle function in those with and without LBP are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ( CRD42017076773 ).

摘要

引言

在全球范围内,下背痛(LBP)是导致残疾的最大原因之一。在患有 LBP 的人群中,已证明臀中肌等肌肉的功能障碍会增加脊柱负荷并降低脊柱稳定性。与没有 LBP 的人相比,患有 LBP 的人的臀中肌功能存在差异,尽管这仅在个别研究中有所报道。本系统评价的目的是确定是否有 LBP 病史或当前 LBP 的成年人与没有 LBP 的成年人相比,其臀中肌功能的测量值存在差异。

方法

从创建到 2018 年 12 月,我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、AMED、PsycINFO、PubMED、ProQuest 数据库、CINAHL 和 SPORTDiscus 上搜索了已发表的期刊文章和会议摘要,没有语言限制。仅纳入参与者年龄在 18 岁及以上的病例对照研究。参与者可以患有任何类型和持续时间的 LBP。研究可以使用任何可量化的临床评估或测量工具评估臀中肌功能,参与者可以非负重或负重,以及在静态或动态活动期间进行评估。两名作者独立进行质量评估和数据提取。

结果

24 篇纳入的文章涉及 1088 名 LBP 参与者和 998 名无 LBP 参与者。与无 LBP 的参与者相比,LBP 参与者的臀中肌肌肉力量较弱,触发点较多。活动水平、疲劳性、激活时间、峰值激活时间、横截面积和肌肉厚度的结果不清楚。由于纳入研究的异质性,未进行荟萃分析。

结论

在临床实践中,在评估和管理患有 LBP 的患者时,应考虑本系统评价的结果。需要有未来的研究清楚地定义 LBP 的类型和持续时间,并前瞻性地评估有和无 LBP 的患者的臀中肌肌肉功能。

试验注册

PROSPERO(CRD42017076773)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb58/6805550/b84470dd52fa/12891_2019_2833_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验