Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Biomaterial Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Sep;28(9):3007-3015. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05754-2. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
This study aimed to clarify the natural knee kinematics provided by bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) compared with those of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and normal knees.
Volunteers and patients who had undergone UKA and BCR-TKA with anatomical articular surface performed squatting motion under fluoroscopy. To estimate the knee's spatial position and orientation, a two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique was used. The rotation angle and anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral sides of the femur relative to the tibia in each flexion angle were directly evaluated using the same local coordinate system and their differences amongst the three groups were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc pairwise comparison.
From 0° to 10° of flexion, the femoral external rotation angle of BCR-TKA knees was significantly greater than that of normal and UKA knees and the medial side of BCR-TKA knees was significantly more anteriorly located than that of normal and UKA knees. From 40° to 50° of flexion, the medial side of UKA knees was significantly more posteriorly located than that of normal and BCR-TKA knees. From 30° to 120° of flexion, the lateral side of BCR-TKA knees was significantly more anteriorly located than that of normal and UKA knees.
The in vivo kinematics of BCR-TKA knees reproduces those of normal knees to a lower extent than those of UKA knees. Thus, BCR-TKA with anatomical articular surface reproduces in vivo kinematics of normal knees to a lower extent than UKA.
III.
本研究旨在阐明保留双交叉韧带的全膝关节置换术(BCR-TKA)与单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)和正常膝关节相比提供的自然膝关节运动学。
接受 UKA 和 BCR-TKA 解剖关节面的志愿者和患者在透视下进行下蹲运动。为了估计膝关节的空间位置和方向,使用二维/三维配准技术。在每个屈曲角度下,直接使用相同的局部坐标系评估股骨相对于胫骨的内侧和外侧的旋转角度和前后平移,并用双向方差分析和 Bonferroni 事后两两比较分析三组之间的差异。
从 0°到 10°的屈曲,BCR-TKA 膝关节的股骨外旋角度明显大于正常和 UKA 膝关节,BCR-TKA 膝关节的内侧明显更靠前,而 UKA 膝关节的内侧明显更靠前,而 BCR-TKA 膝关节的内侧明显更靠前。从 40°到 50°的屈曲,UKA 膝关节的内侧明显更靠后,而 BCR-TKA 膝关节的内侧明显更靠前。从 30°到 120°的屈曲,BCR-TKA 膝关节的外侧明显更靠前,而 UKA 膝关节的外侧明显更靠前。
BCR-TKA 膝关节的体内运动学比 UKA 膝关节更接近正常膝关节。因此,与 UKA 相比,解剖关节面的 BCR-TKA 在更大程度上再现了正常膝关节的体内运动学。
III。