The University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 Feb;24(1):78-99. doi: 10.1177/1088868319883174. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
The mainstream epistemology of social psychology is markedly ahistorical, prioritizing the quantification of processes assumed to be lawful and generalizable. Social psychologists often consider theory to be either a practical for summarizing what is known about a problem area and making predictions or a that illuminates the counterintuitive causal force underlying a variety of disparate phenomena. I propose a third vision of . From this perspective, theories should be committed to deep interdisciplinarity and historical validity claims-understanding individual and group experiences as part of historically contingent forces. Theories also should be critical, containing an awareness of the researcher as implicated in the social process and committed to actively improving society. To demonstrate its viability, I review classic works from the history of the discipline that exemplify critical-historical theory and offer concrete implications for theorists interested in employing this approach in their own work.
主流的社会心理学认识论具有明显的非历史性,优先考虑对被认为是有规律和可推广的过程进行量化。社会心理学家通常认为理论要么是一种实用的工具,用于总结一个问题领域的已知内容并进行预测,要么是一种解释,揭示了各种不同现象背后的反直觉因果力。我提出了对理论的第三种看法。从这个角度来看,理论应该致力于深入的跨学科性和历史有效性主张——将个人和群体的经验理解为历史偶然力量的一部分。理论也应该具有批判性,意识到研究者在社会过程中所涉及的,并致力于积极改善社会。为了证明其可行性,我回顾了该学科历史上的经典著作,这些著作体现了批判历史理论,并为那些有兴趣在自己的工作中采用这种方法的理论家提供了具体的启示。