Department of ORL Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløwsvej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jan;277(1):207-215. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05698-w. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
To evaluate the individual and combined ability of videostroboscopy (VS), high-speed digital imaging (HSDI), enhanced endoscopy (EE) and saline infusion (SI) to predict neoplasia, defined as glottic precursor lesion (GPL) or T1a glottic cancer, in patients suspected for glottic neoplasia.
A nationwide prospective cohort study of patients treated by cordectomy for suspected GPL or T1a glottic cancer from August 1st 2016 to October 31st 2018 was conducted in the five Danish University Departments of Head and Neck surgery. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and area under Receiver Operating Curves (AUC-ROC) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals with respect to the histological diagnosis. Logistic regression with an imputation model for missing data was applied.
261 patients aged 34-91 years participated; 79 (30.3%) with non-neoplasia (i.e., inflammation, papilloma, hyperkeratosis) and 182 (69.7%) neoplasia, hereof 95 (36.4%) with GPL and 87 (33.3%) with T1a glottic cancer. Data from 188 VS, 60 HSDI, 100 preoperative EE, 209 intraoperative EE, and 234 SI were analyzed. In the complete case analysis the AUC-ROC of each diagnostic test was low, but increased when the tests were combined and especially if the combination included EE. However, multinomial logistic regression with imputation showed significant association (p < 0.05) only between age, male gender, and perpendicular vasculature in intraoperative EE, and the endpoint neoplasia.
Intraoperative EE was the most accurate diagnostic method in detecting neoplasia. The prediction ability of methods applied preoperatively was more limited, but improved when test modalities were combined.
评估频闪喉镜(VS)、高速数字成像(HSDI)、增强内镜(EE)和盐水灌注(SI)在预测声带病变(GPL)或 T1a 声门癌方面的个体和联合能力,这些病变被定义为声带前病变(GPL)或 T1a 声门癌。
2016 年 8 月 1 日至 2018 年 10 月 31 日,丹麦五所大学耳鼻喉科系对因疑似 GPL 或 T1a 声门癌而行声带切除术的患者进行了一项全国性前瞻性队列研究。根据组织学诊断,计算了敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值以及受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC-ROC),置信区间为 95%。采用缺失数据的逻辑回归进行了分析。
共有 261 名 34-91 岁的患者参与研究;79 例(30.3%)为非肿瘤(即炎症、乳头状瘤、角化过度),182 例(69.7%)为肿瘤,其中 95 例(36.4%)为 GPL,87 例(33.3%)为 T1a 声门癌。分析了 188 例 VS、60 例 HSDI、100 例术前 EE、209 例术中 EE 和 234 例 SI。在完全病例分析中,每种诊断试验的 AUC-ROC 均较低,但当联合应用时会增加,特别是当联合应用 EE 时。然而,有缺失值的多项逻辑回归分析显示,仅在术中 EE 中,年龄、男性、垂直血管和终点病变的存在与显著相关(p<0.05)。
术中 EE 是检测肿瘤最准确的诊断方法。术前应用方法的预测能力较为有限,但当测试方法联合应用时,其预测能力有所提高。