Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, 207 High Street, Middletown, CT 06459, USA; Neuroscience & Behavior Program, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA.
Neuroscience & Behavior Program, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 8;97:109795. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109795. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
Slot-machine gambling incorporates numerous audiovisual cues prior to and during reward delivery (e.g. spinning wheels, flashing lights, celebratory sounds). Over time, these cues may motivate playing and even elicit cravings and relapse in those affected by gambling disorder. Animal studies suggest a heightened attraction to these cues despite diminished predictive ability under reward uncertainty, as evidenced by sign-tracking behavior in rats. Repeated amphetamine administration may also enhance the incentive value attributed to cues. Here, we explored the impact of reward uncertainty and prior amphetamine sensitization on the relative attractiveness and conditioned reinforcing properties of serial Pavlovian cues with different degrees of predictive and incentive value in rats. Animals were sensitized through repeated injections of amphetamine (1-4 mg/kg) or saline and then trained in a Pavlovian autoshaping task involving two sequential lever-auditory cue combinations (CS1, CS2) under Certain (100%-1) or Uncertain (50%-1-2-3) reward conditions. Subsequently, we evaluated the impact of acute amphetamine exposure on cue attraction. Our results suggest that Uncertainty alone enhanced attraction towards the reward-proximal CS2. However, combined sensitization and Uncertainty reversed cue preference relative to Uncertainty alone, enhancing attraction towards the more predictive reward-distal CS1. Both cues acquired conditioned reinforcing properties, despite the CS2 being otherwise ignored in all groups besides Uncertainty. However, combined sensitization and Uncertainty increased the reinforcing value of both cues and doubled the amount of interaction with the CS1 lever per presentation. Our results imply competitive mechanisms for attributing incentive value to gambling-related cues between reward uncertainty, prior amphetamine sensitization, and acute amphetamine administration.
老虎机赌博在奖励发放前和发放过程中包含许多视听线索(例如旋转的轮子、闪烁的灯光、庆祝的声音)。随着时间的推移,这些线索可能会激发人们的赌博欲望,甚至在那些受赌博障碍影响的人中引起渴望和复发。动物研究表明,尽管在奖励不确定性下预测能力下降,但这些线索的吸引力仍然增加,这表现在大鼠的标志跟踪行为中。重复给予安非他命也可能增强线索的激励价值。在这里,我们探讨了奖励不确定性和先前安非他命敏化对具有不同预测和激励价值程度的连续巴甫洛夫线索的相对吸引力和条件强化特性的影响。动物通过反复注射安非他命(1-4mg/kg)或生理盐水进行敏化,然后在涉及两个连续杠杆-听觉线索组合(CS1、CS2)的巴甫洛夫自动成型任务中接受训练,奖励条件为确定(100%-1)或不确定(50%-1-2-3)。随后,我们评估了急性安非他命暴露对线索吸引力的影响。我们的结果表明,仅不确定性就增强了对接近奖励的 CS2 的吸引力。然而,敏化和不确定性的组合相对于不确定性单独作用逆转了线索偏好,增强了对更具预测性的奖励远程 CS1 的吸引力。尽管在除不确定性之外的所有组中 CS2 都被忽略,但这两个线索都获得了条件强化特性。然而,敏化和不确定性的组合增加了两个线索的强化价值,并使每个呈现时与 CS1 杠杆的交互次数增加了一倍。我们的结果表明,在奖励不确定性、先前安非他命敏化和急性安非他命给药之间,存在竞争机制来归因于与赌博相关的线索的激励价值。