Suppr超能文献

改善 ICU 患者的轮班交接护理。

Improving end-of-rotation transitions of care among ICU patients.

机构信息

Section of Pulmonary Diseases, Critical Care, and Environmental Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Mar;29(3):250-259. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009867. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitalised patients whose inpatient teams rotate off service experience increased mortality related to end-of-rotation care transitions, yet standardised handoff practices are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

Develop and implement a multidisciplinary patient-centred handoff intervention to improve outcomes for patients who are critically ill during end-of-rotation transitions.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-centre, controlled pilot study of medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients whose resident team was undergoing end-of-rotation transition at a university hospital from June 2017 to February 2018.

INTERVENTION

A 4-item intervention was implemented over two study periods. Intervention 1 included: (1) in-person bedside handoff between teams rotating off and on service, (2) handoff checklist, (3) nursing involvement in handoff, and (4) 30 min education session. Intervention 2 included the additional option to conduct bedside handoff via videoconferencing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Implementation was measured by repeated clinician surveys and direct observation. Patient outcomes included length of stay (LOS; ICU and hospital) and mortality (ICU, hospital and 30 days). Clinician perceptions were modelled over time using per cent positive responses in logistic regression. Patient outcomes were compared with matched control 'transition' patients from 1 year prior to implementation of the intervention.

RESULTS

Among 270 transition patients, 46.3% were female with a mean age of 55.9 years. Mechanical ventilation (64.1%) and in-hospital death (27.6%) rates were prevalent. Despite high implementation rates-handoff participation (93.8%), checklist utilisation (75.0%), videoconferencing (62.5%), nursing involvement (75.0%)-the intervention did not significantly improve LOS or mortality. Multidisciplinary survey data revealed significant improvement in acceptability by nursing staff, while satisfaction significantly declined for resident physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

In this controlled pilot study, a structured ICU end-of-rotation care transition strategy was feasible to implement with high fidelity. While mortality and LOS were not affected in a pilot study with limited power, the pragmatic strategy of this intervention holds promise for future trials.

摘要

背景

住院患者的住院团队轮班时,其在轮班结束时的护理交接过程中与死亡率相关的风险增加,但标准的交接实践却缺乏。

目的

制定并实施多学科以患者为中心的交接干预措施,以改善轮班结束时处于危急状态的患者的结局。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项单中心、对照试点研究,纳入了 2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 2 月期间在一所大学医院接受住院治疗的重症监护病房(ICU)患者,这些患者的主治团队正在轮班结束时交接。

干预措施

在两个研究期间实施了 4 项干预措施。干预 1 包括:(1)轮班结束和开始服务的团队之间的床边交接;(2)交接清单;(3)护理人员参与交接;(4)30 分钟的教育课程。干预 2 包括通过视频会议进行床边交接的附加选项。

主要观察指标

实施情况通过反复的临床医生调查和直接观察来衡量。患者结局包括 ICU 和医院的住院时间(LOS)和死亡率(ICU、医院和 30 天)。采用逻辑回归模型,根据百分比阳性应答率,对临床医生的认知进行随时间的建模。将患者的结局与干预实施前 1 年的匹配“交接”患者进行比较。

结果

在 270 例交接患者中,46.3%为女性,平均年龄为 55.9 岁。机械通气(64.1%)和院内死亡(27.6%)的发生率较高。尽管交接参与率(93.8%)、清单使用率(75.0%)、视频会议使用率(62.5%)、护理人员参与率(75.0%)较高,但该干预措施并未显著改善 LOS 或死亡率。多学科调查数据显示,护理人员对交接的可接受性显著提高,而住院医师的满意度则显著下降。

结论

在这项对照试点研究中,一种结构良好的 ICU 轮班结束时的护理交接策略具有很高的可行性,可以实现高保真度的实施。虽然在一项试点研究中,由于研究对象数量有限,该干预措施对死亡率和 LOS 没有影响,但这种实用策略为未来的试验提供了希望。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验