Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Jul;34(5):919-936. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1680735. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
Neuropsychological evaluations include hold tests like word-reading ability as estimates of premorbid intellect thought to be resilient to the effects of neurologic insult. We tested the alternative hypothesis that exposure to concussion or repetitive subclinical head impacts throughout early life may stunt acquisition of word-reading skills. Data were obtained from student-athletes within the CARE Consortium that completed the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR). Measures of head trauma burden included self-reported concussion history and cumulative years of exposure to collision sports. We evaluated the effects of head trauma, sociodemographic (race, SES), and academic (SAT/ACT scores, learning disorder) variables on WTAR standard score using linear regression. Analyses were repeated in a football-only subsample estimating age of first exposure to football as a predictor. We analyzed data from 6,598 participants (72.2% white, 39.6% female, mean ± SD age = 18.8 ± 1.2 years). Head trauma variables collectively explained 0.1% of the variance in WTAR standard scores, with years of collision sport exposure weakly predicting lower WTAR standard scores ( = .026-.035, very small effect). In contrast, sociodemographic and academic variables collectively explained 20.9-22.5% of WTAR standard score variance, with strongest effects noted for SAT/ACT scores (β = .313-.337, medium effect), LD diagnosis (β = -.115 to -.131, small effect), and SES ( = .101-.108, small effect). Age of first exposure to football did not affect WTAR scores in a football-only sample. Wechsler Test of Adult Reading performance appears unrelated to history of self-reported concussion(s) and/or repetitive subclinical head trauma exposure in current collegiate athletes. Sociodemographic and academic variables should be incorporated in test score interpretations for diverse populations like athletes.
神经心理学评估包括词汇阅读能力等保持测验,这些测验被认为是对神经损伤影响具有弹性的发病前智力的估计。我们检验了另一种假设,即一生中反复受到轻度颅脑冲击或亚临床性头部撞击,可能会阻碍词汇阅读技能的获得。这些数据来自 CARE 联盟中的学生运动员,他们完成了韦氏成人阅读测验(WTAR)。头部创伤负担的测量包括自我报告的脑震荡史和接触碰撞运动的累计年数。我们使用线性回归评估了头部创伤、社会人口统计学(种族、SES)和学术(SAT/ACT 分数、学习障碍)变量对 WTAR 标准分数的影响。在仅足球样本中,我们重复了分析,估计首次接触足球的年龄作为预测因子。我们分析了来自 6598 名参与者的数据(72.2%为白人,39.6%为女性,平均年龄 ± 标准差=18.8±1.2 岁)。头部创伤变量共同解释了 WTAR 标准分数方差的 0.1%,而接触碰撞运动的年限则微弱地预测 WTAR 标准分数较低(=0.026-0.035,很小的影响)。相比之下,社会人口统计学和学术变量共同解释了 WTAR 标准分数方差的 20.9-22.5%,其中 SAT/ACT 分数的影响最大(β=0.313-0.337,中等影响)、LD 诊断(β=-0.115 至-0.131,小影响)和 SES(β=0.101-0.108,小影响)。在仅足球样本中,首次接触足球的年龄并不影响 WTAR 分数。在当前大学生运动员中,韦氏成人阅读测验的表现似乎与自我报告的脑震荡史和/或反复亚临床性头部创伤无关。对于像运动员这样的不同人群,应该将社会人口统计学和学术变量纳入测试分数解释中。