Suppr超能文献

利用社会健康网络分析癌症治疗中的非标签处方情况。

Profiling off-label prescriptions in cancer treatment using social health networks.

作者信息

Nikfarjam Azadeh, Ransohoff Julia D, Callahan Alison, Polony Vladimir, Shah Nigam H

机构信息

Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford, California, USA.

Stanford School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2019 Oct;2(3):301-305. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz025. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate using patient posts in social media as a resource to profile off-label prescriptions of cancer drugs.

METHODS

We analyzed patient posts from the Inspire health forums (www.inspire.com) and extracted mentions of cancer drugs from the 14 most active cancer-type specific support groups. To quantify drug-disease associations, we calculated information component scores from the frequency of posts in each cancer-specific group with mentions of a given drug. We evaluated the results against three sources: manual review, Wolters-Kluwer Medi-span, and Truven MarketScan insurance claims.

RESULTS

We identified 279 frequently discussed and therefore highly associated drug-disease pairs from Inspire posts. Of these, 96 are FDA approved, 9 are known off-label uses, and 174 do not have records of known usage (potentially novel off-label uses). We achieved a mean average precision of 74.9% in identifying drug-disease pairs with a true indication association from patient posts and found consistent evidence in medical claims records. We achieved a recall of 69.2% in identifying known off-label drug uses (based on Wolters-Kluwer Medi-span) from patient posts.

摘要

目的

研究将社交媒体上患者发布的内容作为一种资源,用于描述癌症药物的非标签处方情况。

方法

我们分析了来自Inspire健康论坛(www.inspire.com)的患者帖子,并从14个最活跃的特定癌症类型支持小组中提取了对癌症药物的提及。为了量化药物与疾病的关联,我们根据每个癌症特定小组中提及给定药物的帖子频率计算信息成分得分。我们对照三个来源评估了结果:人工审核、Wolters-Kluwer Medi-span和Truven MarketScan保险理赔数据。

结果

我们从Inspire帖子中识别出279对经常讨论且因此高度相关的药物-疾病对。其中,96对是FDA批准的,9对是已知的非标签用途,174对没有已知用途记录(可能是新的非标签用途)。我们从患者帖子中识别具有真实适应症关联的药物-疾病对时,平均精度达到74.9%,并在医疗理赔记录中发现了一致的证据。我们从患者帖子中识别已知非标签药物用途(基于Wolters-Kluwer Medi-span)时,召回率达到69.2%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/632c/6951869/ca2bc7144769/ooz025f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验