Division of Neurosurgery, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Emeritus Professor of Neurosurgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:311-322. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.193. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
The Glasgow Coma Scale and its derived Score have been adopted worldwide for assessing the degree of impaired responsiveness in traumatic brain injury and other kinds of acute brain damage. In this historical vignette, we describe how the foundations for their enduring success were laid during their initial development. To provide a unique additio nal background and context, the material from interviews with one of the originators of the scale was brought together with information from key publications in the early years after the first description of the scale in 1974. This historical investigation shows how the contents of the eye, verbal, and motor components of the scale were assembled through analysis of previous systems, guided by early clinimetric principles. Its reproducibility as a tool for clinical communication was confirmed through innovative studies of interobserver variability. To test its validity, international collaborations linking units in Britain, the Netherlands, and the United States were pursued. These collaborations were accompanied by the creation of the total Glasgow Coma Score with a 6-point motor subdivision. The observation that outcomes after severe head injury were similar in the different countries, despite marked variations in management, stimulated controversy that promoted further interest in traumatic brain injury research and a recommendation for the worldwide use of the scale as a common severity marker. Inclusion of the scale in major developments such as the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and the National Traumatic Coma Databank cemented its influential position in clinical care and research for the succeeding decades.
格拉斯哥昏迷量表及其衍生评分已在全球范围内用于评估创伤性脑损伤和其他类型的急性脑损伤患者的反应迟钝程度。在这段历史小插曲中,我们将描述其最初发展过程中是如何为其持久成功奠定基础的。为了提供独特的附加背景和上下文,我们将量表的一位创始人的访谈材料与 1974 年首次描述该量表后的早期关键出版物中的信息汇集在一起。这项历史研究表明,通过对早期临床计量学原则指导下的先前系统进行分析,如何组合了量表的眼部、语言和运动分量表的内容。通过对观察者间变异性的创新性研究,确认了其作为临床交流工具的可重复性。为了检验其有效性,英国、荷兰和美国的单位之间进行了国际合作。这些合作伴随着总格拉斯哥昏迷评分的创建,其中包括 6 分的运动细分。尽管管理方式存在明显差异,但严重头部损伤后的结果在不同国家相似,这一观察结果引发了争议,进一步激发了人们对创伤性脑损伤研究的兴趣,并建议将该量表作为一种通用的严重程度标志物在全球范围内使用。该量表被纳入主要发展领域,如高级创伤生命支持 (ATLS) 和国家创伤性昏迷数据库,巩固了其在随后几十年临床护理和研究中的重要地位。