Skinner M W, Binzer S M, Fredrickson J M, Smith P G, Holden T A, Holden L K, Juelich M F, Turner B A
Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Laryngoscope. 1988 Oct;98(10):1092-9. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198810000-00012.
Four postlinguistically deaf adults were evaluated presurgically with a one- or two-channel vibrotactile aid and postsurgically with a multichannel, multielectrode, intracochlear implant. Although the vibrotactile aid provided awareness of sound and enhanced flow of conversation, benefit to lipreading was small on videotaped tests and speech tracking. Scores on recorded, sound-only speech tests were not significantly above chance except in discrimination of noise from voice. With the cochlear implant, benefit to lipreading was significantly greater than with the vibrotactile aid, and scores on sound-only tests were significantly above chance. Communication was markedly better with the implant than with the vibrotactile aid. In counseling those who get no benefit from a hearing aid, the results of this study provide data on the amount of benefit one- or two-channel vibrotactile aids provide postlinguistically deaf adults who are subsequently implanted.
对四名语后聋成年人在术前使用单通道或双通道振动触觉辅助设备进行评估,并在术后使用多通道、多电极人工耳蜗进行评估。尽管振动触觉辅助设备能让人感知声音并增强对话流畅度,但在录像测试和言语跟踪中,对唇读的帮助较小。在仅声音的录音测试中,除了区分噪音和语音外,得分没有显著高于随机水平。使用人工耳蜗时,对唇读的帮助明显大于振动触觉辅助设备,仅声音测试的得分也显著高于随机水平。使用人工耳蜗时的交流明显比使用振动触觉辅助设备时更好。在为那些从助听器中未获得益处的人提供咨询时,本研究结果提供了关于单通道或双通道振动触觉辅助设备为随后接受植入手术的语后聋成年人带来益处程度的数据。