Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7023, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Växa Sverige, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulls väg 26, 756 51 Uppsala, Sweden.
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jan;103(1):514-528. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16958. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
This study simulated the consequences of crossbreeding between Swedish Holstein and Swedish Red on herd dynamics and herd profitability under Swedish conditions. Two base herds were simulated using a stochastic herd simulation model, SimHerd Crossbred. The herds reflected average Swedish conventional and organic herds having purebred Swedish Holstein. For each base herd, 3 breeding strategies were simulated: pure-breeding, 2-breed terminal crossbreeding, and 2-breed rotational crossbreeding. The terminal crossbreeding strategy implied having a nucleus of Swedish Holstein and a proportion of F Swedish Red × Swedish Holstein crossbred cows within the same herd. The crossbreds in this herd did not produce replacement heifers but exclusively beef × dairy cross calves. Beef semen was also used in the pure-breeding (10-20% in cows) and the rotational crossbreeding (40% in cows) strategies to retain a limited surplus of replacement heifers. To ensure an adequate number of crossbreds in the terminal crossbreeding strategy, X-sorted sexed semen was used for insemination in all the purebred heifers. The outcome was 67% purebred and 31% F crossbreds in the herd. In addition, 31% heterosis was expressed compared with 67% heterosis expressed using a 2-breed rotational crossbreeding strategy. Compared with the pure-breeding strategy, crossbreeding increased the annual contribution margin per cow by €20 to €59, with the rotational crossbreeding strategy creating the largest profitability. The increased profitability was mainly due to improved functional traits, especially fertility. For the conventional production system, the replacement rate was 39.3% in the pure-breeding strategy and decreased to 35.8 and 30.1% in the terminal and rotational crossbreeding strategy, respectively. Similar changes happened in the organic production system. Additionally, the crossbreeding strategies earned €22 to €42 more annually per cow from selling live calves for slaughter due to the extended use of beef semen. Milk production was similar between pure-breeding and terminal crossbreeding, and only decreased 1 to 2% in rotational crossbreeding. These results show that crossbreeding between Swedish Holstein and Swedish Red can be profitable in both conventional and organic Swedish herds using the strategies we have simulated. However, some aspects remain to be investigated, such as the economically optimal breeding strategy, genetic improvement, and transition strategies.
本研究模拟了在瑞典条件下,瑞典荷斯坦牛和瑞典红牛杂交对牛群动态和牛群盈利能力的影响。使用随机牛群模拟模型 SimHerd Crossbred 模拟了两个基础牛群。这些牛群反映了平均的瑞典传统和有机牛群,具有纯种的瑞典荷斯坦牛。对于每个基础牛群,模拟了 3 种繁殖策略:纯种繁殖、两品种终端杂交和两品种轮交。终端杂交策略意味着在同一个牛群中拥有一个瑞典荷斯坦牛核心和一定比例的 F 代瑞典红牛×瑞典荷斯坦杂交母牛。该牛群中的杂交牛只生产牛肉×奶牛杂交牛犊,不生产后备母牛。纯种繁殖(母牛中占 10-20%)和轮交繁殖(母牛中占 40%)策略中也使用了牛肉精液,以保留有限数量的后备母牛。为了确保终端杂交策略中有足够数量的杂交牛,所有纯种后备母牛都使用 X 染色体分选的精液进行配种。结果是牛群中 67%为纯种牛,31%为 F 代杂交牛。此外,与使用两品种轮交繁殖策略表达的 67%杂种优势相比,表达了 31%的杂种优势。与纯种繁殖策略相比,杂交繁殖使每头牛的年度边际贡献增加了 20 到 59 欧元,其中轮交繁殖策略创造了最大的盈利能力。盈利能力的提高主要归因于功能性状的改善,特别是生育能力。对于传统生产系统,纯种繁殖策略的替代率为 39.3%,在终端和轮交繁殖策略中分别降低到 35.8%和 30.1%。有机生产系统也发生了类似的变化。此外,由于更广泛地使用牛肉精液,杂交繁殖策略使每头牛每年从出售活牛犊用于屠宰中额外获得 22 到 42 欧元的收入。纯种繁殖和终端杂交繁殖的牛奶产量相似,仅在轮交繁殖中下降了 1%至 2%。这些结果表明,在使用我们模拟的策略的情况下,瑞典荷斯坦牛和瑞典红牛的杂交在传统和有机的瑞典牛群中是有利可图的。然而,仍有一些方面需要进一步研究,例如经济上最佳的繁殖策略、遗传改良和过渡策略。