Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Heinrich-Lanz-Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Mar;196(3):205-212. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01548-0. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
Randomized trials indicate that electronic or app-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes may improve outcomes in cancer patients. To analyze if an app-based follow-up would be accepted by elderly cancer patients, we conducted a single-center prospective feasibility study (NCT03196050).
Cancer patients (≥60 years) without concurrent uncontrolled severe medical conditions and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70 were eligible if they were able to use the smartphone app. The primary endpoint was compliance over 1 year, calculated as patient-specific and study date-specific response rate to questions sent as push notifications; in this interim analysis, we report on 4‑month data. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of a subjective health status item (SPHS) with the physician-rated KPS.
Out of 225 patients screened, 54 patients agreed to participate and 29 activated the app and participated in the study. The mean age was 66 years (61-78). The individual compliance rate averaged at 58.3% (standard deviation SD = 35%). Daily compliance was 53.3% on average (SD = 10.8%) and declined over time. The average percentage of patients who sent answers at least weekly was 75.0% (SD = 14.8%) and declined from 100% in week 1 to 53.8% in week 17 post-enrollment. Secondary outcomes indicated that questionnaires such as the EORTC-QLQ-C30 are accepted via app and that there is a significant moderate correlation between the SPHS and KPS scores (r = 0.566; p < 0.001).
Our data indicate that an app-based follow-up incorporating EORTC questionnaires might be possible in highly selected elderly cancer patients with modest compliance rates. Further trials should aim at an increased participation rate.
随机试验表明,电子或基于应用程序的患者报告结果评估可能会改善癌症患者的结局。为了分析基于应用程序的随访是否会被老年癌症患者接受,我们进行了一项单中心前瞻性可行性研究(NCT03196050)。
如果能够使用智能手机应用程序,无并发未控制的严重疾病且卡氏功能状态(KPS)≥70 的癌症患者符合条件。主要终点是 1 年内的依从性,计算方法为根据患者和研究日期的具体情况对推送通知中发送的问题的响应率;在本次中期分析中,我们报告了 4 个月的数据。次要结局包括比较主观健康状况项目(SPHS)与医生评定的 KPS。
在 225 名筛选的患者中,54 名患者同意参加,29 名患者激活了应用程序并参与了研究。平均年龄为 66 岁(61-78 岁)。个体依从率平均为 58.3%(标准差[SD] = 35%)。平均每日依从率为 53.3%(SD = 10.8%),且随时间下降。平均每周至少发送答案的患者比例为 75.0%(SD = 14.8%),从第 1 周的 100%下降到第 17 周入组后的 53.8%。次要结局表明,通过应用程序接受 EORTC-QLQ-C30 等问卷,SPHS 和 KPS 评分之间存在显著中度相关性(r = 0.566;p < 0.001)。
我们的数据表明,在选择高度合适的、依从率适中的老年癌症患者中,基于应用程序的随访结合 EORTC 问卷可能是可行的。进一步的试验应旨在提高参与率。