Suppr超能文献

广泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌:基于非黏菌素联合治疗方案的比较研究

Extensive drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a comparative study between non-colistin based combinations.

作者信息

Elsayed Eman, Elarabi Mohamed A, Sherif Dana A, Elmorshedi Mohamed, El-Mashad Noha

机构信息

Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt.

Clinical Pharmacy Department, Gastrointestinal Surgery Center (GISC), Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Feb;42(1):80-88. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00940-1. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

Abstract

Background The Gastrointestinal Surgery Center (GISC)-Mansoura University, faced a series of extensive drug resistant (XDR) A. baumannii cases, that were microbiologically resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, carbapenems and tigecycline. Colistin would have been a last resort therapy in such situation, however, intravenous polymyxins E (colistin) is relatively unavailable in Egypt. Many practitioners tried to form antibiotic combinations from the available antibiotics to overcome the resistance mechanisms of the pathogen. Objective Evaluate the clinical outcomes of these combinations retrospectively. Setting The study took place at the GISC, which is an academic specialized center affiliated with Mansoura University-Egypt. Method Clinical data were collected from the patients' files, where the subjects were classified into two major groups according to the therapeutic intervention. Group 1 included 24 patients divided into 4 subgroups. The first was treated by a Cephalosporin with a Fluoroquinolone (1A), The second was treated by a Carbapenem with a Fluoroquinolone (1B), The third was treated by a B-lactam with an Aminoglycoside (1C) and the fourth was treated by Carbapenem with a Glycylcycline (1D). Group 2 included 6 patients, treated with Tigecycline and Ampicillin-Sulbactam. Main outcome measure Primary outcomes are the A. baumannii microbiological culture negativity after 14 days of therapy and the 30 days' survival after the antibiotic course, while the secondary outcomes are the expected therapies' side effects. Results Group 2 is associated with significant higher primary outcomes without a significant difference regarding the secondary outcomes. Conclusion The combination of Tigecycline and Ampicillin-Sulbactam, appears to be a clinically effective therapy against XDR A. baumannii, despite each agent being resistant alone, without alerting adverse effects.

摘要

背景 曼苏拉大学胃肠外科中心(GISC)面临一系列广泛耐药(XDR)鲍曼不动杆菌病例,这些病例在微生物学上对青霉素、头孢菌素、氟喹诺酮类、氨基糖苷类、碳青霉烯类和替加环素耐药。在这种情况下,黏菌素本应是最后的治疗手段,然而,静脉用多黏菌素E(黏菌素)在埃及相对难以获得。许多从业者试图从可用抗生素中形成联合抗生素方案,以克服病原体的耐药机制。

目的 回顾性评估这些联合方案的临床结果。

地点 该研究在GISC进行,GISC是埃及曼苏拉大学附属的学术专业中心。

方法 从患者病历中收集临床数据,根据治疗干预将受试者分为两大组。第1组包括24例患者,分为4个亚组。第一个亚组接受头孢菌素与氟喹诺酮联合治疗(1A),第二个亚组接受碳青霉烯类与氟喹诺酮联合治疗(1B),第三个亚组接受β-内酰胺类与氨基糖苷类联合治疗(1C),第四个亚组接受碳青霉烯类与甘氨酰环素联合治疗(1D)。第2组包括6例患者,接受替加环素和氨苄西林-舒巴坦治疗。

主要结局指标 主要结局是治疗14天后鲍曼不动杆菌微生物培养转阴以及抗生素疗程后30天生存率,次要结局是预期治疗的副作用。

结果 第2组的主要结局显著更高,而次要结局无显著差异。

结论 替加环素和氨苄西林-舒巴坦联合使用,似乎是一种针对XDR鲍曼不动杆菌的临床有效治疗方法,尽管每种药物单独使用时均耐药,但无明显不良反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验