Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Laryngoscope. 2020 Oct;130(10):2397-2404. doi: 10.1002/lary.28401. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of dysphagia definition on the incidence and overall prevalence of dysphagia in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVP) stratified by etiology.
Retrospective medical chart review.
Data was collected from the records of individuals diagnosed with UVP from 2013 to 2018, including patient demographics, dysphagia questionnaire total scores, clinical evaluation dysphagia symptoms, and instrumental swallow assessment outcomes. The annual incidence and overall prevalence of dysphagia were calculated by etiology as counts and percentages across five operational definitions of dysphagia.
A total of 415 individuals met inclusion criteria for the study. Annual prevalence estimates ranged from 19% to 55%, depending on the definition of dysphagia used. The highest prevalence of dysphagia occurred when defined by symptoms or signs identified by the clinician (55%). The lowest prevalence of dysphagia occurred using a definition of abnormal swallowing function documented during instrumental assessment (19%). Dysphagia questionnaire scores were more frequently abnormal in those with iatrogenic than idiopathic etiology of UVP (adjusted P = 0.014). Rate of instrumental assessment and documentation of aspiration was highest for central UVP etiology (33%). On average, pneumonia was rare (6%) irrespective of UVP etiology.
Up to 55% of patients diagnosed with UVP complained of dysphagia, but only 21% had dysphagia symptoms severe enough to prompt instrumental assessment. Incidence and severity of dysphagia varied depending on UVP etiologic category as well as dysphagia definition. The etiology of UVP may impact dysphagia risk and severity in this population and warrants further investigation.
IV Laryngoscope, 130:2397-2404, 2020.
目的/假设:本研究旨在通过对病因分层的单侧声带麻痹(UVP)患者进行研究,探讨吞咽困难定义对吞咽困难发生率和总体患病率的影响。
回顾性病历回顾。
从 2013 年至 2018 年诊断为 UVP 的患者记录中收集数据,包括患者人口统计学资料、吞咽困难问卷总分、临床评估吞咽困难症状和仪器吞咽评估结果。根据五种吞咽困难操作定义,计算病因吞咽困难的年度发病率和总体患病率。
共有 415 名患者符合本研究纳入标准。每年的患病率估计值范围为 19%至 55%,具体取决于吞咽困难的定义。当使用临床医生识别的症状或体征定义时,吞咽困难的患病率最高(55%)。当使用仪器评估记录的异常吞咽功能定义时,吞咽困难的患病率最低(19%)。与特发性 UVP 病因相比,医源性 UVP 病因的吞咽困难问卷评分更常异常(调整后 P=0.014)。中枢性 UVP 病因进行仪器评估和记录吸入的比例最高(33%)。无论 UVP 病因如何,肺炎的平均发生率都较低(6%)。
多达 55%的诊断为 UVP 的患者抱怨有吞咽困难,但只有 21%的患者有吞咽困难症状严重到需要进行仪器评估。发病率和严重程度取决于 UVP 的病因分类以及吞咽困难的定义。UVP 的病因可能会影响该人群的吞咽困难风险和严重程度,需要进一步研究。
IV 喉镜,130:2397-2404,2020。