Gärdenfors Moa, Johansson Victoria, Schönström Krister
Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Center for Languages and Literature, The Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 12;10:2463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02463. eCollection 2019.
What do spelling errors look like in children with sign language knowledge but with variation in hearing background, and what strategies do these children rely on when they learn how to spell in written language? Earlier research suggests that the spelling of children with hearing loss is different, because of their lack of hearing, which requires them to rely on other strategies. In this study, we examine whether, and how, different variables such as hearing degree, sign language knowledge and bilingualism may affect the spelling strategies of children with Swedish sign language, , (STS) knowledge, and whether these variables can be mirrored in these children's spelling. The spelling process of nineteen children with STS knowledge (mean age: 10.9) with different hearing degrees, born into deaf families, is described and compared with a group of fourteen hearing children without STS knowledge (mean age: 10.9). Keystroke logging was used to investigate the participants' writing process. The spelling behavior of the children was further analyzed and categorized into different spelling error categories. The results indicate that many children showed exceptionally few spelling errors compared to earlier studies, that may derive from their early exposure of STS, enabling them to use the fingerspelling strategy. All of the children also demonstrated similar typing skills. The deaf children showed a tendency to rely on a visual strategy during spelling, which may result in incorrect, but visually similar, words, i.e., a type of spelling errors not found in texts by hearing children with STS knowledge. The deaf children also showed direct transfer from STS in their spelling. It was found that hard-of-hearing children together with hearing children of deaf adults (CODAs), both with STS knowledge, used a sounding strategy, rather than a visual strategy. Overall, this study suggests that the ability to hear and to use sign language, together and respectively, play a significant role for the spelling patterns and spelling strategies used by the children with and without hearing loss.
对于有手语知识但听力背景各异的儿童来说,拼写错误是什么样的?这些儿童在学习书面语言拼写时依赖哪些策略?早期研究表明,听力损失儿童的拼写有所不同,因为他们听力缺失,这使他们需要依赖其他策略。在本研究中,我们考察不同变量,如听力程度、手语知识和双语能力,是否以及如何影响掌握瑞典手语(STS)知识的儿童的拼写策略,以及这些变量能否在这些儿童的拼写中得到体现。描述了19名出生于聋人家庭、掌握STS知识且听力程度不同的儿童(平均年龄:10.9岁)的拼写过程,并将其与14名没有STS知识的听力正常儿童(平均年龄:10.9岁)进行比较。使用击键记录来调查参与者的书写过程。对儿童的拼写行为进行进一步分析,并归类为不同的拼写错误类别。结果表明,与早期研究相比,许多儿童的拼写错误极少,这可能源于他们早期接触STS,使他们能够使用指拼策略。所有儿童还表现出相似的打字技能。聋童在拼写时倾向于依赖视觉策略,这可能导致拼写错误但视觉上相似的单词,即在掌握STS知识的听力正常儿童的文本中未发现的一种拼写错误类型。聋童在拼写中也表现出从STS的直接迁移。研究发现,有听力障碍的儿童以及有聋人父母的听力正常儿童(CODA),在掌握STS知识的情况下,都使用发音策略,而不是视觉策略。总体而言,本研究表明,听力能力和使用手语的能力,分别以及共同,对有听力损失和无听力损失儿童所使用的拼写模式和拼写策略起着重要作用。