Alandijany Thamir
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Front Microbiol. 2019 Nov 8;10:2611. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02611. eCollection 2019.
When host cells are invaded by viruses, they deploy multifaceted intracellular defense mechanisms to control infections and limit the damage they may cause. Host intracellular antiviral immunity can be classified into two main branches: (i) intrinsic immunity, an interferon (IFN)-independent antiviral response mediated by constitutively expressed cellular proteins (so-called intrinsic host restriction factors); and (ii) innate immunity, an IFN-dependent antiviral response conferred by IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) products, which are (as indicated by their name) upregulated in response to IFN secretion following the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Recent evidence has demonstrated temporal regulation and specific viral requirements for the induction of these two arms of immunity during herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection. Moreover, they exert differential antiviral effects to control viral replication. Although they are distinct from one another, the words "intrinsic" and "innate" have been interchangeably and/or simultaneously used in the field of virology. Hence, the aims of this review are to (1) elucidate the current knowledge about host intrinsic and innate immunity during HSV-1 infection, (2) clarify the recent advances in the understanding of their regulation and address the distinctions between them with respect to their induction requirements and effects on viral infection, and (3) highlight the key roles of the viral E3 ubiquitin ligase ICP0 in counteracting both aspects of immunity. This review emphasizes that intrinsic and innate immunity are temporally and functionally distinct arms of host intracellular immunity during HSV-1 infection; the findings are likely pertinent to other clinically important viral infections.
当宿主细胞被病毒入侵时,它们会部署多方面的细胞内防御机制来控制感染并限制病毒可能造成的损害。宿主细胞内抗病毒免疫可分为两个主要分支:(i)固有免疫,一种由组成性表达的细胞蛋白(所谓的固有宿主限制因子)介导的不依赖干扰素(IFN)的抗病毒反应;以及(ii)天然免疫,一种由IFN刺激基因(ISG)产物介导的依赖IFN的抗病毒反应,这些产物(如其名称所示)在宿主模式识别受体(PRR)识别病原体相关分子模式(PAMP)后,随着IFN分泌而被上调。最近的证据表明,在单纯疱疹病毒1型(HSV-1)感染期间,这两种免疫分支的诱导存在时间调控和特定的病毒需求。此外,它们发挥不同的抗病毒作用来控制病毒复制。尽管“固有”和“天然”这两个词彼此不同,但在病毒学领域中它们一直被交替使用和/或同时使用。因此,本综述的目的是:(1)阐明关于HSV-1感染期间宿主固有免疫和天然免疫的现有知识;(2)阐明对其调控理解的最新进展,并探讨它们在诱导需求和对病毒感染的影响方面的区别;(3)强调病毒E3泛素连接酶ICP0在对抗这两种免疫方面的关键作用。本综述强调,在HSV-1感染期间,固有免疫和天然免疫是宿主细胞内免疫在时间和功能上不同的分支;这些发现可能与其他临床上重要的病毒感染相关。