Chen Zhonggai, Ma Chiyuan, Xu Langhai, Wu Zhipeng, He Yuzhe, Xu Kai, Moqbel Safwat Adel Abdo, Wu Lidong
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Nov 3;2019:6703828. doi: 10.1155/2019/6703828. eCollection 2019.
To provide updated evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of laser acupuncture for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
A literature search in 9 databases was conducted from their inception through February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) written in English that compared active laser acupuncture with placebo in KOA patients were included. Two authors independently extracted data from these trials. Meta-analysis software was used to analyze the data. Included studies were assessed in terms of the follow-up period, the methodological quality, and appropriateness of their technical features.
Of 357 studies, seven RCTs (totaling 395 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The short-term outcomes showed that laser acupuncture offered significant pain relief over placebo when assessed by the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) pain score ( = 0.02), while there was no significant difference between laser acupuncture and placebo based on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score ( = 0.25). For subgroup analysis, laser acupuncture had superiority over placebo in terms of both VAS and WOMAC pain scores in the appropriate technical features subgroup and the excellent methodological quality subgroup. But the effect of laser acupuncture on pain relief was not maintained in terms of either VAS ( = 0.19) or WOMAC pain score ( = 0.60). The pooled effect showed no significant difference between laser acupuncture and placebo at either time point according to WOMAC function scale, WOMAC stiffness scale, and quality of life outcome.
Our findings indicate that laser acupuncture can effectively reduce knee pain for patients with KOA at short term when appropriate technical features are applied, but the effect likely fades away during the subsequent follow-up period.
提供来自随机对照试验(RCT)的最新证据,以证明激光针刺疗法对膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者的有效性。
对9个数据库从建库至2019年2月进行文献检索。纳入以英文撰写的、比较KOA患者主动激光针刺与安慰剂的随机对照试验。两位作者独立从这些试验中提取数据。使用荟萃分析软件分析数据。根据随访期、方法学质量及其技术特征的适宜性对纳入研究进行评估。
在357项研究中,7项随机对照试验(共395例患者)符合纳入标准。短期结果显示,采用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分评估时,激光针刺疗法比安慰剂能显著减轻疼痛(P = 0.02),而基于西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛评分,激光针刺疗法与安慰剂之间无显著差异(P = 0.25)。亚组分析显示,在技术特征适宜亚组和方法学质量优秀亚组中,激光针刺疗法在VAS和WOMAC疼痛评分方面均优于安慰剂。但就VAS(P = 0.19)或WOMAC疼痛评分(P = 0.60)而言,激光针刺疗法对疼痛缓解的效果未得到维持。根据WOMAC功能量表、WOMAC僵硬量表和生活质量结果,汇总效应显示激光针刺疗法与安慰剂在任一观察时间点均无显著差异。
我们的研究结果表明,当应用适宜的技术特征时,激光针刺疗法可在短期内有效减轻KOA患者的膝关节疼痛,但在随后的随访期内效果可能会消失。