Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0225299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225299. eCollection 2019.
Without election or re-election motivations, what factors have impacted public goods preferences in an authoritarian country such as China? More specifically, what makes political elites be devoted to or not be devoted to local public goods provision? This study, using basic education provision as an example, intends to gauge the impact of leadership selection on public goods provision in China. It is found that career trajectories of politicians have a bearing on basic education provision. The findings suggest that even under a top-down appointment system, homegrown politicians are more willing to cater to local preferences, especially on basic education provision, which suggests an extension of Riker's theory, applied in a non-democratic regime. Numerous studies have examined the impacts of decentralization on a variety of aspects of public governance in different contexts. Nevertheless, the unique contribution of this study is its policy implication that political centralization may not be an effective solution for local public governance even in an authoritarian context.
在没有选举或连任动机的情况下,是什么因素影响了中国这样的威权国家的公共品偏好?更具体地说,是什么让政治精英致力于或不致力于提供地方公共品?本研究以基础教育供给为例,旨在衡量领导层选拔对中国公共品供给的影响。研究发现,政治家的职业轨迹对基础教育供给有影响。研究结果表明,即使在自上而下的任命制度下,本土政治家也更愿意迎合地方偏好,尤其是在基础教育供给方面,这表明雷克理论在非民主政权中的应用得到了扩展。许多研究已经考察了权力下放对不同背景下公共治理各个方面的影响。然而,本研究的独特贡献在于其政策意义,即在威权背景下,政治集中化甚至可能不是解决地方公共治理的有效办法。