McLeod Charlie, Norman Richard, Litton Edward, Saville Benjamin R, Webb Steve, Snelling Thomas L
Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Nov 12;16:100486. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100486. eCollection 2019 Dec.
The purpose of late phase clinical trials is to generate evidence of sufficient validity and generalisability to be translated into practice and policy to improve health outcomes. It is therefore crucial that the chosen endpoints are meaningful to the clinicians, patients and policymakers that are the end-users of evidence generated by these trials. The choice of endpoints may be improved by understanding their characteristics and properties. This narrative review describes the evolution, range and relative strengths and weaknesses of endpoints used in late phase trials. It is intended to serve as a reference to assist those designing trials when choosing primary endpoint(s), and for the end-users charged with interpreting these trials to inform practice and policy.
晚期临床试验的目的是生成具有足够有效性和可推广性的证据,以便转化为实践和政策,从而改善健康结果。因此,所选择的终点指标对于作为这些试验所产生证据的最终使用者的临床医生、患者和政策制定者而言具有意义至关重要。通过了解终点指标的特征和属性,可以改进终点指标的选择。本叙述性综述描述了晚期试验中使用的终点指标的演变、范围以及相对优势和劣势。其旨在作为一种参考,以协助那些设计试验的人员选择主要终点指标,并供负责解读这些试验以指导实践和政策制定的最终使用者参考。