Turnes Tiago, Silva Beatriz A, Kons Rafael L, Detanico Daniele
Physical Effort Laboratory, Center of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil; and.
Biomechanics Laboratory, Center of Sports, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Feb 1;36(2):455-460. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003441.
Turnes, T, Silva, BA, Kons, RL, and Detanico, D. Is bilateral deficit in handgrip strength associated with performance in specific judo tasks? J Strength Cond Res 36(2): 455-460, 2022-The aim of this study was to identify the existence of bilateral deficit (BD) on maximal handgrip strength during standing and seated positions in judo athletes and to correlate this with judo-specific tasks. Nineteen male judo athletes (age 22.1 ± 4.6 years) performed unilateral and bilateral handgrip strength tests in seated and standing postures to calculate bilateral index (BI). Athletes then performed the Judogi Grip Strength Test (dynamic and isometric modes) and Special Judo Fitness Test. The comparisons between bilateral and unilateral handgrip strength for each position, weight categories, or training experience (novice <10 years and advanced >10 years) were made by paired and unpaired t-tests. The sum of bilateral forces was significantly lower than unilateral forces at standing (unilateral: 105 ± 20 vs. bilateral: 102 ± 21 kgf, BI: -3.0 ± 5.9%, p = 0.043), but not at seated position (unilateral: 100 ± 19 vs. bilateral: 98 ± 19 kgf, BI: -2.1 ± 7.3%, p = 0.230), indicating BD only at standing position. Pearson coefficient correlations were not significant between judo tests and BI, with similar performance in judo tests between athletes with BD and bilateral facilitation (p > 0.05). Significant BD was observed at standing position in advanced (-4.5 ± 7.1%, p = 0.049) but not in novice athletes (-0.9 ± 3.8%, p = 0.592). We concluded that BI in maximal handgrip strength test was not related with judo-specific tests. However, the BD occurred only at standing position, suggesting that postural stability may contribute for this phenomenon.
图尔内斯、T、席尔瓦、BA、孔斯、RL和德塔尼科、D。握力双侧缺陷与特定柔道任务的表现有关吗?《力量与体能研究杂志》36(2): 455 - 460,2022年——本研究的目的是确定柔道运动员在站立和坐姿时最大握力的双侧缺陷(BD)的存在,并将其与特定柔道任务相关联。19名男性柔道运动员(年龄22.1±4.6岁)在坐姿和站姿下进行单侧和双侧握力测试,以计算双侧指数(BI)。运动员随后进行柔道服握力测试(动态和等长模式)和特殊柔道体能测试。通过配对和非配对t检验对每个姿势、体重级别或训练经验(新手<10年和高级>10年)的双侧和单侧握力进行比较。站立时双侧力量总和显著低于单侧力量(单侧:105±20 vs.双侧:102±21千克力,BI:-3.0±5.9%,p = 0.043),但坐姿时并非如此(单侧:100±19 vs.双侧:98±19千克力,BI:-2.1±7.3%,p = 0.230),表明仅在站立姿势存在BD。柔道测试与BI之间的皮尔逊系数相关性不显著,BD和双侧促进的运动员在柔道测试中的表现相似(p>0.05)。在高级运动员中站立姿势观察到显著的BD(-4.5±7.1%,p = 0.049),但新手运动员中未观察到(-0.9±3.8%,p = 0.592)。我们得出结论,最大握力测试中的BI与特定柔道测试无关。然而,BD仅发生在站立姿势,表明姿势稳定性可能导致了这一现象。