School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine & Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 16;38(3):433-443. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.089. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
In times of vaccine hesitancy and decreasing immunization coverage, it is crucial to exploit the potential of digital solutions to support immunization programmes and ultimately increase vaccine uptake. Scant evidence exists on the impact of email-based immunization reminders. In particular, while email communication is exponentially increasing at the global level, its use for health communication is still sporadic and limited data exists on its application to immunization programmes. The objective of this study is to systematically retrieve and critically appraise the available literature on the effectiveness of email-based reminders to increase vaccine uptake, with the ultimate aim to inform and encourage its integration in the implementation of immunization programmes.
We conducted a systematic review of literature following the PRISMA. We included studies providing quantitative comparative data on any measure of vaccine uptake. We extracted data on study design, study population, vaccine type and details of email-based interventions; data were pooled by type of comparison (no reminders, traditional reminders, other digital reminders).
Eleven studies were included, 90% with experimental study designs. While email communication succeeds in increasing vaccine uptake when compared with no intervention, weak and heterogeneous data exist supporting the superiority of email reminders, as compared to traditional methods or other digital reminders. Encouraging evidence report the effectiveness of reminder methods combining different strategies and tailored to target populations' preferences.
Theoretically, email communication offers many advantages: it is cheaper and faster, it can be automated and linked to electronic immunization registries, and reach people on the move. As we urge the need for further research to prove email communication impact on vaccine uptake in different settings, we underline the importance of identifying how to best integrate email communication in vaccine delivery equipping immunization programmes with technical infrastructures and normative frameworks suitable to embrace innovation.
在疫苗犹豫和免疫接种率下降的时代,充分利用数字解决方案的潜力来支持免疫规划,最终提高疫苗接种率至关重要。关于基于电子邮件的免疫提醒对免疫规划效果的影响的证据很少。特别是,虽然电子邮件通信在全球范围内呈指数级增长,但它在卫生通信中的使用仍然零星且有限,关于其在免疫规划中的应用的数据也很少。本研究的目的是系统地检索和批判性评价现有的关于基于电子邮件的提醒以提高疫苗接种率的文献,最终目的是为其整合到免疫规划的实施中提供信息和鼓励。
我们按照 PRISMA 进行了系统的文献回顾。我们纳入了提供任何疫苗接种率衡量指标的定量比较数据的研究。我们提取了关于研究设计、研究人群、疫苗类型和基于电子邮件的干预措施细节的数据;数据按比较类型(无提醒、传统提醒、其他数字提醒)进行汇总。
共纳入 11 项研究,其中 90%为实验性研究设计。虽然与无干预相比,电子邮件沟通在提高疫苗接种率方面是成功的,但支持电子邮件提醒优于传统方法或其他数字提醒的数据是微弱且存在异质性的。令人鼓舞的证据报告了结合不同策略和针对目标人群偏好定制的提醒方法的有效性。
从理论上讲,电子邮件沟通具有许多优势:它更便宜、更快,可以自动化并与电子免疫登记系统链接,并且可以随时随地联系到人。在我们强烈要求进一步研究以证明在不同环境下电子邮件沟通对疫苗接种率的影响的同时,我们强调了确定如何最好地将电子邮件沟通整合到疫苗接种服务中的重要性,为免疫规划配备适合接受创新的技术基础设施和规范框架。