Suppr超能文献

死亡焦虑自评量表心理测量学特性的系统评价

A systematic review of the psychometric properties of death anxiety self-report measures.

作者信息

Zuccala Matteo, Menzies Rachel E, Hunt Caroline J, Abbott Maree J

机构信息

Clinical Psychology Unit, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Death Stud. 2022;46(2):257-279. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1699203. Epub 2019 Dec 6.

Abstract

Recent research suggests that the transdiagnostic construct of death anxiety may be a basic fear underlying a range of anxiety disorders. Although the investigation of death anxiety in clinical populations is relatively recent, the death anxiety literature as a whole has a longer history evidenced by the number of instruments developed to measure this construct. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the evidence supporting the psychometric properties of self-report death anxiety measures. Relevant studies were identified via a systematic search of four electronic databases in addition to reference list searches. Two independent reviewers evaluated relevant studies using the established Terwee et al. quality appraisal tool. Of the 1831 studies identified, 89 met inclusion criteria. These studies investigated the psychometric properties of 21 self-report scales of death anxiety as well as six subscales. No measure was found to possess evidence of adequacy on all evaluated quality criteria. The Templer Death Anxiety Scale, Concerns about Dying Instrument and Death Concern Scale were found to possess the most evidence supporting their validity and reliability. Overall findings suggest that additional research is needed to establish the psychometric adequacy of death anxiety instruments, especially given increased utilization of these measures in both clinical and research settings.

摘要

近期研究表明,死亡焦虑这一跨诊断概念可能是一系列焦虑症背后的一种基本恐惧。尽管对临床人群中死亡焦虑的研究相对较新,但从为测量这一概念而开发的工具数量来看,死亡焦虑文献的整体历史更为悠久。本系统评价旨在评估支持自我报告死亡焦虑测量工具心理测量特性的证据。除了搜索参考文献列表外,还通过对四个电子数据库进行系统检索来识别相关研究。两名独立评审员使用已确立的特韦等人的质量评估工具对相关研究进行评估。在识别出的1831项研究中,89项符合纳入标准。这些研究调查了21种自我报告死亡焦虑量表以及6个分量表的心理测量特性。未发现有任何测量工具在所有评估的质量标准上都有充分的证据。发现坦普勒死亡焦虑量表、濒死担忧量表和死亡关注量表拥有最多支持其有效性和可靠性的证据。总体研究结果表明,需要开展更多研究来确立死亡焦虑测量工具的心理测量充分性,尤其是考虑到这些测量工具在临床和研究环境中的使用日益增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验