Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917228. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17228.
Monitoring trends in prescription analgesic use among adults with musculoskeletal conditions provides insight into how changing prescribing practices, guidelines, and policy measures may affect those who need pain management.
To evaluate trends in prescription opioid use and nonopioid analgesic use among adults with functional limitations attributable to musculoskeletal conditions.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This repeated cross-sectional study uses data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study from 1999 to 2016. Data were analyzed from January to July 2019. The participants were adults aged 30 to 79 years who reported functional limitations due to back or neck problems and/or arthritis or rheumatism.
Any use of a prescription opioid or exclusive use of a prescription nonopioid analgesic.
In this population of 7256 adults with 1 or more functional limitations attributable to a musculoskeletal condition (4226 women [59.9%]; 3508 [74.4%] non-Hispanic white individuals; median [interquartile range] age, 63 [53-70] years), opioid use and exclusive nonopioid analgesic use exhibited approximately reciprocal patterns of change from 1999 to 2016. Opioid use increased significantly (difference in prevalence for 2015-2016 vs 1999-2000, 7.2%; 95% CI, 1.3% to 13%; P for trend = .002), and exclusive use of nonopioid analgesics decreased significantly (difference in prevalence for 2015-2016 vs 1999-2000, -13%; 95% CI, -19% to -7.5%; P for trend < .001) during this period. The increase in any opioid use was driven by long-term rather than short-term use. A crossover in the prevalence of opioid use and exclusive use of nonopioid analgesics occurred between 2003 and 2006, after which opioid use was more prevalent. Between 2013 and 2016, decreases in opioid use were observed among men (difference in prevalence for 2015-2016 vs 2013-2014, -11%; 95% CI, -21% to 1.8%) and participants with less than a high school education (difference, -15%; 95% CI, -24% to -6.1%). During this same period, exclusive nonopioid analgesic use also decreased markedly across the population (difference, -5.3%; 95% CI, -9.1% to -1.5%).
The substitution of opioids for nonopioid analgesics between 2003 and 2006 may have occurred as evidence emerged on the cardiovascular risks associated with nonopioid analgesics. Reductions in opioid use between 2013 and 2016 were most substantial among those with low socioeconomic status, who may encounter barriers in accessing alternatives. Despite those decreases, opioid use remained more prevalent in 2015 to 2016 than in 1999 to 2000, suggesting a potentially long tail for the opioid epidemic.
监测成年人肌肉骨骼疾病处方止痛药使用趋势,可以深入了解不断变化的处方实践、指南和政策措施如何影响那些需要疼痛管理的人。
评估有功能障碍的成年人中使用处方类阿片和非处方类镇痛药的趋势。
设计、设置和参与者:本重复横断面研究使用了 1999 年至 2016 年国家健康和营养检查调查的数据。数据分析于 2019 年 1 月至 7 月进行。参与者为年龄在 30 至 79 岁之间、因背部或颈部问题和/或关节炎或风湿病而报告有功能障碍的成年人。
任何处方类阿片的使用或仅使用处方非阿片类镇痛药。
在这个由 7256 名有 1 种或多种肌肉骨骼疾病导致的功能障碍的成年人组成的人群中(4226 名女性[59.9%];3508 名[74.4%]非西班牙裔白人;中位数[四分位间距]年龄,63 [53-70]岁),从 1999 年到 2016 年,阿片类药物的使用和非阿片类镇痛药的单独使用呈现出相互变化的趋势。阿片类药物的使用显著增加(2015-2016 年与 1999-2000 年相比的流行率差异,7.2%;95%置信区间,1.3%至 13%;趋势 P 值 = .002),而非阿片类镇痛药的单独使用显著减少(2015-2016 年与 1999-2000 年相比的流行率差异,-13%;95%置信区间,-19%至-7.5%;趋势 P 值 < .001)。长期而非短期使用阿片类药物导致了阿片类药物使用的增加。2003 年至 2006 年期间,阿片类药物使用和非阿片类镇痛药单独使用的流行率出现交叉,此后阿片类药物使用更为普遍。2013 年至 2016 年期间,男性(2015-2016 年与 2013-2014 年相比的流行率差异,-11%;95%置信区间,-21%至 1.8%)和受教育程度较低(差异,-15%;95%置信区间,-24%至-6.1%)的参与者的阿片类药物使用量下降。在此期间,非阿片类镇痛药的单独使用也在整个人群中明显减少(差异,-5.3%;95%置信区间,-9.1%至-1.5%)。
2003 年至 2006 年期间,非阿片类镇痛药与心血管风险相关的证据出现后,阿片类药物可能取代了非阿片类镇痛药。2013 年至 2016 年期间阿片类药物使用量的减少在社会经济地位较低的人群中最为显著,这些人群可能在获得替代药物方面遇到障碍。尽管有这些减少,2015 年至 2016 年的阿片类药物使用仍比 1999 年至 2000 年更为普遍,这表明阿片类药物流行可能持续时间较长。