Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal (ESPUM), 7101 Park Ave, Montreal, Quebec, H3N 1X9, Canada; Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), 850 St-Denis, Montreal, Quebec, H2X A09, Canada.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;64:101654. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.101654. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
Important social disparities in colorectal screening exist in Canada. Few studies have assessed disparities further along the cancer control continuum. Here we assess the associations between social and material deprivation, physician density, rural residence, and the absence of provincial mail-based screening programs and colorectal cancer (CRC) stage at diagnosis.
Colorectal cancer cases and stage data ("local or regional" if stage 0, I, or II, "late" if stage III or IV) were obtained through the Canadian Cancer Registry (2011-2015, N = 54,745). Cases were linked to 2006 Canadian Census Dissemination Area-level data on rural/urban status, exposure to a provincial mail-based screening program, and social and material deprivation (Pampalon Index quintile groups); and to Scott's Medical Database 2011 physician density data (<7 vs. ≥ 7/10,000). Age, sex, and predictor-adjusted Generalized estimating equation (GEE) Poisson models were used to determine independent associations between predictors and late-stage at diagnosis.
Half of CRC cases are diagnosed at stage III or IV (51 %), with younger age groups experiencing higher late-stage prevalence (57 % among those aged 18-49). The covariate-adjusted late-stage prevalence was 2-percentage points higher in most materially- and socially-deprived areas (95 % CI: 1 %, 4 %, in both, respectively) and in provinces with no mail-based screening programs (95 % CI: 1 %, 2 %). No significant differences were observed according to rural residence or physician density.
Social disparities in late-stage CRC diagnosis are modest. Continued surveillance of these disparities may be warranted as provinces continue to promote early cancer detection through screening, and stage distributions may change overtime.
在加拿大,结直肠癌筛查存在重要的社会差异。很少有研究进一步评估癌症控制连续体中存在的差异。在这里,我们评估了社会和物质剥夺、医生密度、农村居住和缺乏省级邮件筛查计划与结直肠癌(CRC)诊断时的分期之间的关联。
通过加拿大癌症登记处(2011-2015 年,N=54745)获得结直肠癌病例和分期数据(0、I 或 II 期为“局部或区域”,III 或 IV 期为“晚期”)。病例与 2006 年加拿大人口普查传播区域层面数据(农村/城市状态、是否暴露于省级邮件筛查计划以及社会和物质剥夺(Pampalon 指数五分位数组))以及 2011 年 Scott 的医学数据库的医生密度数据(<7 与≥7/10000)进行了关联。使用年龄、性别和预测因素调整的广义估计方程(GEE)泊松模型来确定预测因素与诊断时晚期阶段之间的独立关联。
一半的 CRC 病例诊断为 III 期或 IV 期(51%),年龄较小的组中晚期病例比例较高(18-49 岁组中为 57%)。在物质和社会上最贫困的地区,调整后的晚期阶段的患病率增加了 2 个百分点(分别为 95%CI:1%,4%),在没有邮件筛查计划的省份中,调整后的晚期阶段的患病率增加了 2 个百分点(95%CI:1%,2%)。农村居住或医生密度无显著差异。
CRC 晚期诊断的社会差异不大。随着各省继续通过筛查促进早期癌症检测,并且随着时间的推移,分期分布可能会发生变化,因此可能需要继续监测这些差异。