School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of New South Wales , Sydney, Australia.
Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales , Sydney, Australia.
Curr Eye Res. 2020 Aug;45(8):921-930. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1705984. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
To determine the utility of corneal confocal microscopy and tear neuromediator analysis in the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) as a result of type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Seventy individuals with either type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes (T1D/T2D) underwent corneal confocal microscopy to assess the corneal nerve morphology. The concentration of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in tears was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Motor excitability studies were conducted on the median nerve to assess axonal ion channel function. Based on total neuropathy score (TNS), participants were stratified into DPN (DPN+ve; TNS ≥ 2; T1D, n = 19; T2D, n = 16) and without DPN (DPN-ve; TNS ≤ 1; T1D, n = 19; T2D, n = 16). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated to obtain specificity and sensitivity of the measures to diagnose DPN.
In T1D, the concentration of substance P and confocal microscopy measures were significantly reduced ( < .010) in DPN+ve. Also, for the nerve excitability measures, mean peak response, percentage of threshold electrotonus at peak and after 90-100 ms, superexcitability and subexcitability were significantly reduced ( < .050) in DPN+ve. In T2D, except for inferior whorl length ( = .190), all other corneal confocal microscopy measures were significantly reduced ( < .010) in DPN+ve, but there was no difference in substance P concentration. For the diagnosis of DPN in T1D, the AUC for inferior whorl length (0.910), mean peak response (0.800) and concentration of substance P (0.770) were high and in T2D, the AUC for corneal nerve fiber length (0.809) and nerve fractal dimension (0.777) were high.
Corneal confocal microscopy parameters provide a better diagnostic ability to detect DPN in T1D and T2D than nerve excitability measures or concentrations of tear neuromediators. The concentration of substance P could also be useful in diagnosing DPN but for T1D only.
确定角膜共聚焦显微镜和泪液神经递质分析在诊断 1 型和 2 型糖尿病引起的糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)中的效用。
70 名 1 型糖尿病或 2 型糖尿病(T1D/T2D)患者接受角膜共聚焦显微镜检查,以评估角膜神经形态。通过酶联免疫吸附试验测量眼泪中 P 物质和降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)的浓度。对正中神经进行运动诱发电位研究,以评估轴突离子通道功能。根据总神经病变评分(TNS),将参与者分为 DPN(DPN+ve;TNS≥2;T1D,n=19;T2D,n=16)和无 DPN(DPN-ve;TNS≤1;T1D,n=19;T2D,n=16)。计算受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积以获得诊断 DPN 的各项措施的特异性和敏感性。
在 T1D 中,DPN+ve 患者的 P 物质浓度和共聚焦显微镜测量值显著降低(<0.010)。此外,对于神经兴奋性测量,峰值反应平均值、峰值和 90-100ms 后阈电紧张的百分比、超兴奋性和亚兴奋性在 DPN+ve 中也显著降低(<0.050)。在 T2D 中,除了下旋长度(=0.190)外,所有其他角膜共聚焦显微镜测量值在 DPN+ve 中均显著降低(<0.010),但 P 物质浓度无差异。对于 T1D 中 DPN 的诊断,下旋长度(0.910)、峰值反应平均值(0.800)和 P 物质浓度(0.770)的 AUC 较高,而在 T2D 中,角膜神经纤维长度(0.809)和神经分形维数(0.777)的 AUC 较高。
与神经兴奋性测量或泪液神经递质浓度相比,角膜共聚焦显微镜参数在检测 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的 DPN 方面提供了更好的诊断能力。P 物质浓度也可用于诊断 DPN,但仅用于 T1D。