Polido Graziela Jorge, de Miranda Mariana Mangini Vaz, Carvas Nelson, Mendonça Rodrigo de Holanda, Caromano Fátima Aparecida, Reed Umbertina Conti, Zanoteli Edmar, Voos Mariana Callil
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde do Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Dement Neuropsychol. 2019 Oct-Dec;13(4):436-443. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-040011.
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is genetic and progressive, caused by large bi-allelic deletions in the SMN1 gene, or the association of a large deletion and a null variant.
To evaluate the evidence about cognitive outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).
Searches on the PUBMED/Medline, Web of Knowledge and Scielo databases retrieved 26 studies (1989 to 2019, descriptors "spinal muscular atrophy" and "cognition"). Nine studies were selected according to the eligibility criteria: (1) cognition tested in individuals with SMA; (2) written in English or Spanish. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions was used to describe design, bias, participants, evaluation protocol and main findings. This study was registered on the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO).
Three studies described normal cognition. In another three studies, cognitive outcomes were above average. Cognitive impairment was found in three studies. Poor cognitive performance was more frequently reported in studies that were recent, included children with SMA type I and that employed visual/auditory attention and executive function tests. Protocols and cognitive domains varied, precluding metanalysis.
The severity of motor impairment may be related to cognitive outcomes: studies that included a higher number/percentage of children with SMA type I found cognitive impairment. The establishment of gold-standard protocols is necessary. Further studies should compare the cognitive outcomes of subjects with SMA types I to IV.
脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)是遗传性且进行性的,由SMN1基因的双等位基因大片段缺失或大片段缺失与无效变异的联合所致。
评估关于脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)认知结果的证据。
在PUBMED/Medline、Web of Knowledge和Scielo数据库中进行检索,共检索到26项研究(1989年至2019年,描述词为“脊髓性肌萎缩症”和“认知”)。根据纳入标准选择了9项研究:(1)对SMA患者进行认知测试;(2)以英文或西班牙文撰写。采用干预性非随机研究中的偏倚风险来描述设计、偏倚、参与者、评估方案和主要发现。本研究已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(PROSPERO)上注册。
三项研究描述认知正常。另外三项研究中,认知结果高于平均水平。三项研究发现存在认知障碍。在近期的研究、纳入I型SMA儿童的研究以及采用视觉/听觉注意力和执行功能测试的研究中,更频繁地报告了认知表现不佳。方案和认知领域各不相同,无法进行荟萃分析。
运动障碍的严重程度可能与认知结果有关:纳入I型SMA儿童数量/百分比更高的研究发现了认知障碍。有必要建立金标准方案。进一步的研究应比较I型至IV型SMA患者的认知结果。