Suppr超能文献

欧洲医疗器械卫生技术评估健康经济指南的批判性综述

Critical Review of European Health-Economic Guidelines for the Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices.

作者信息

Blüher Maximilian, Saunders Sita J, Mittard Virginie, Torrejon Torres Rafael, Davis Jason A, Saunders Rhodri

机构信息

Coreva Scientific, Königswinter, Germany.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Nov 29;6:278. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00278. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Health-technology assessment (HTA) is a recognized mechanism to determine the relative benefits of innovative medical technologies. One aspect is their health-economic impact. While the process and methodology for pharmaceuticals is well-established, guidance for medical devices is sparse. To provide an overview of the health-economic aspect in current European HTA guidelines concerning medical devices and identifying issues raised and potential improvements proposed in recent literature. Available guidelines by European agencies were each reviewed and summarized. To complement this, a full systematic review of current literature concerning potential improvements to existing HTA practices for medical devices, from PubMed and EMBASE, was conducted; the focus was on health economics. Authors could only review documents in English, French, or German. The systematic review yielded 518 unique articles concerning HTA for medical devices, 32 of which were considered for full-text review after screening of all abstracts. There is very limited consensus in-and mostly a complete lack of-guidance specific to medical devices in official HTA guidelines, for both clinical and economic analyses. Twenty two of 41 European countries had published official HTA guidance in English, French, or German. Among these only 4 (England, France, the Netherlands, and Sweden) dedicated a chapter or separate document to medical devices. In the literature, there is sufficient evidence to suggest medical devices need to be addressed separately from pharmaceuticals. However, mostly challenges are discussed rather than implementable solutions offered. We present the following set of frequently discussed issues and summarize any solutions that pertain to them: a weak evidence base, learning-curve effects, organizational impact, incremental innovation, diversity of devices, dynamic pricing, and transferability. We further combine reviewed information to suggest a set of possible best practices for health-economic assessment of medical devices. For greater efficiency in medical-device innovation, European agencies should look to (re-)address the specific requirements of medical devices in their HTA guidelines. When both the health-economic and data requirements for the HTA of medical devices are defined, the development of practical solutions will likely follow.

摘要

卫生技术评估(HTA)是确定创新医疗技术相对效益的公认机制。其中一个方面是它们对健康经济的影响。虽然药品的评估流程和方法已经成熟,但针对医疗设备的指导却很少。本文旨在概述当前欧洲HTA指南中关于医疗设备的健康经济方面,并识别近期文献中提出的问题和潜在改进建议。我们对欧洲各机构发布的现有指南进行了逐一审查和总结。为了补充这一工作,我们还对PubMed和EMBASE中有关改进现有医疗设备HTA实践的当前文献进行了全面的系统综述;重点是健康经济学。作者仅审查英文、法文或德文文件。系统综述产生了518篇关于医疗设备HTA的独特文章,在筛选所有摘要后,其中32篇被考虑进行全文审查。在官方HTA指南中,针对医疗设备的临床和经济分析,特定指导意见的共识非常有限,且大多完全缺乏。41个欧洲国家中有22个以英文、法文或德文发布了官方HTA指南。在这些国家中,只有4个(英国、法国、荷兰和瑞典)专门为医疗设备设立了一章或单独的文件。在文献中,有充分证据表明医疗设备需要与药品分开对待。然而,讨论的大多是挑战,而非可实施的解决方案。我们提出以下一组经常讨论的问题,并总结与之相关的任何解决方案:证据基础薄弱、学习曲线效应、组织影响、渐进性创新、设备多样性、动态定价和可转移性。我们进一步整合审查信息,为医疗设备的健康经济评估提出一套可能的最佳实践方法。为提高医疗设备创新的效率,欧洲各机构应在其HTA指南中重新审视医疗设备的特定要求。当确定了医疗设备HTA的健康经济和数据要求后,可能会随之开发出实际的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7d0/6895571/fd2de0280c5c/fmed-06-00278-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验