Department of geriatrics, Amphia hospital, Langendijk 75, 4819, EV, Breda, the Netherlands.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1276-x.
Fluorescein angiography is an important and frequently used diagnostic tool in ophthalmological practice. In this case report we describe a patient who experienced an anaphylactic reaction after the injection of fluorescein. Furthermore, we report an interference with laboratory testing by fluorescein in this patient and summarize the literature on this topic.
An 86-year old Caucasian woman undergoing fluorescein angiography due to suspected peripapillary neovascularizations collapsed after the injection of fluorescein. The patient developed an anaphylactic reaction. With fluid resuscitation and oxygen therapy, the patient regained consciousness after a few minutes. The patient was admitted to the geriatric ward for observation, and routine blood and urine tests were performed. Urine protein concentration appeared to be falsely increased as a consequence of disturbance of the laboratory analysis by the presence of fluorescein.
Serious complications can occur with fluorescein angiography, such as an anaphylactic reaction. In the case of anaphylaxis appropriate supportive measures including the use of oxygen and epinephrine (e.g. EpiPen), should be available to prevent morbidity and mortality from this test. Furthermore, these potential complications should be taken into consideration when choosing the healthcare setting for fluorescein angiography, such as the immediate availability of an acute medical team. Several studies have demonstrated the interference of laboratory analyses by fluorescein. The majority of these studies were published 10 to 30 years ago. By presenting this case, the authors hope to bring renewed attention to this phenomenon among clinicians, as falsely increased or decreased laboratory values can result in unnecessary diagnostics and/or therapy.
荧光素血管造影术是眼科实践中一种重要且常用的诊断工具。在本病例报告中,我们描述了一位在注射荧光素后发生过敏反应的患者。此外,我们报告了该患者的实验室检测因荧光素而受到干扰,并对该主题的文献进行了总结。
一位 86 岁的白人女性因疑似视盘周围新生血管而接受荧光素血管造影检查,在注射荧光素后突然晕倒。该患者发生了过敏反应。经过液体复苏和氧疗,患者在几分钟后恢复了意识。该患者被收入老年病房进行观察,并进行了常规的血液和尿液检查。由于实验室分析受到荧光素的干扰,尿液蛋白浓度似乎被错误地升高了。
荧光素血管造影术可能会发生严重的并发症,如过敏反应。在发生过敏反应的情况下,应提供适当的支持性措施,包括使用氧气和肾上腺素(如 EpiPen),以防止该测试导致发病率和死亡率增加。此外,在选择荧光素血管造影术的医疗保健环境时,应考虑到这些潜在的并发症,例如急性医疗团队的即时可用性。已有多项研究表明实验室分析受到荧光素的干扰。这些研究中的大多数都是在 10 到 30 年前发表的。通过呈现这个病例,作者希望引起临床医生对这一现象的重新关注,因为实验室值的假性升高或降低可能会导致不必要的诊断和/或治疗。