Oregon Social Learning Center, United States.
Addict Behav. 2020 Apr;103:106248. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106248. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
Parent substance use is a risk factor early adolescents' substance use. Theoretical models of deviance and general substance use risk may not apply to risk-transmission pathways involving parents' prescription opioid misuse (POM) and child outcomes. Thus, we examined predictions of children's alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana (ATM) use in early adolescence, from parental POM, delinquency, depressive symptoms, and ATM use.
Children (n = 216; 121 female) participated from early childhood to ages 11-12 or 13-14 years with their 111 fathers and 136 mothers. At all available waves, self-reports were collected on each parents' POM, ATM, prescription opioid use (POU), depressive symptoms, and delinquent behavior, and children's ATM use.
Poisson regressions were run separately by parent, controlled for child age and gender and paternal age at child's birth, and accounted for clustering of children in families. Child ATM use was predicted by paternal POM, but the effect was better explained by paternal ATM use, which was a stronger effect in families with higher father-child residential contact. In contrast and unexpectedly, mothers' POU but not POM predicted child ATM use, and the effect was not explained by the significant predictions from maternal ATM use and delinquency.
Fathers' POM and mothers' POU predicted child ATM use by early adolescence. Findings generally were consistent with parent-child risk-transmission processes described for other substances. Resident fathers' substance use and multiple maternal risk factors are worthy foci for prevention of the intergenerational transmission of substance use.
父母的物质使用是青少年早期物质使用的一个风险因素。偏差和一般物质使用风险的理论模型可能不适用于涉及父母处方阿片类药物滥用 (POM) 和儿童结果的风险传递途径。因此,我们研究了父母的 POM、犯罪行为、抑郁症状和 ATM 使用对儿童早期青少年的酒精、烟草和大麻 (ATM) 使用的预测作用。
从儿童早期到 11-12 岁或 13-14 岁,共有 216 名儿童(121 名女性)及其 111 名父亲和 136 名母亲参与了研究。在所有可用的波次中,都收集了每位父母的 POM、ATM、处方阿片类药物使用 (POU)、抑郁症状和犯罪行为以及儿童的 ATM 使用情况的自我报告。
分别按父母进行泊松回归,控制了儿童的年龄和性别以及父亲在孩子出生时的年龄,并考虑了家庭中儿童的聚类情况。儿童的 ATM 使用由父亲的 POM 预测,但父亲的 ATM 使用解释了这一效应,并且在父亲与孩子同住比例较高的家庭中,这一效应更强。相比之下,令人意外的是,母亲的 POU 而不是 POM 预测了儿童的 ATM 使用,而母亲的 ATM 使用和犯罪行为的显著预测并不能解释这一效应。
父亲的 POM 和母亲的 POU 预测了儿童早期的 ATM 使用。研究结果总体上与描述其他物质的亲子风险传递过程一致。居住父亲的物质使用和多个母亲的风险因素是预防物质使用代际传递的重点。