Suppr超能文献

长期乳腺癌幸存者对饮食建议的依从性与癌症预后的关联

Adherence to Dietary Recommendations among Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors and Cancer Outcome Associations.

作者信息

Wang Fei, Cai Hui, Gu Kai, Shi Liang, Yu Danxia, Zhang Minlu, Zheng Wei, Zheng Ying, Bao Pingping, Shu Xiao-Ou

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Department of Breast Surgery, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Feb;29(2):386-395. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0872. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adherence to dietary recommendations has been shown to be associated with reduced mortality in healthy populations. Little is known about the possible benefits of adherence to dietary recommendations among breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Dietary information was collected using food frequency questionnaires at the 5-year postdiagnosis survey in 3,450 5-year breast cancer survivors from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study. Adherence scores to Chinese Food Pagoda (CHFP)-2007, CHFP-2016, modified Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015) were created. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for total mortality and breast cancer-specific events according to adherence scores.

RESULTS

Participants in the highest quartiles of CHFP-2007, CHFP-2016, and DASH had 25% to 34% lower risk of total mortality (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89 for CHFP-2007; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55-1.01 for CHFP-2016; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.91 for DASH), and 36% to 40% lower risk of breast cancer-specific events (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93 for CHFP-2007; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99 for CHFP-2016; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.90 for DASH) comparing with the lowest quartiles. Associations did not vary by known prognostic factors. HEI-2015 scores were not significantly associated with breast cancer outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher adherence to CHFP and DASH dietary guidelines post-cancer diagnosis was associated with reduced risk of both overall death and breast cancer-specific recurrence or death among long-term breast cancer survivors.

IMPACT

Our study highlights the importance of overall dietary quality among long-term breast cancer survivors.

摘要

背景

在健康人群中,坚持饮食建议已被证明与死亡率降低有关。而对于乳腺癌幸存者坚持饮食建议可能带来的益处,人们了解甚少。

方法

在上海乳腺癌生存研究中,对3450名5年乳腺癌幸存者进行诊断后5年的调查时,使用食物频率问卷收集饮食信息。创建了对《中国居民膳食宝塔(2007版)》(CHFP - 2007)、《中国居民膳食宝塔(2016版)》(CHFP - 2016)、改良版的防治高血压饮食方法(DASH)和2015年健康饮食指数(HEI - 2015)的依从性得分。采用Cox比例风险模型,根据依从性得分估计全因死亡率和乳腺癌特异性事件的风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

CHFP - 2007、CHFP - 2016和DASH依从性得分处于最高四分位数的参与者,与最低四分位数的参与者相比,全因死亡率风险降低25%至34%(CHFP - 2007的HR为0.66;95%CI为0.48 - 0.89;CHFP - 2016的HR为0.75;95%CI为0.55 - 1.01;DASH的HR为0.66;95%CI为0.49 - 0.91),乳腺癌特异性事件风险降低36%至40%(CHFP - 2007的HR为0.64;95%CI为0.44 - 0.93;CHFP - 2016的HR为0.67;95%CI为0.45 - 0.99;DASH的HR为0.60;95%CI为0.40 - 0.90)。这些关联不因已知的预后因素而有所不同。HEI - 2015得分与乳腺癌预后无显著关联。

结论

癌症诊断后对CHFP和DASH饮食指南的更高依从性,与长期乳腺癌幸存者的总体死亡风险以及乳腺癌特异性复发或死亡风险降低相关。

影响

我们的研究强调了长期乳腺癌幸存者总体饮食质量的重要性。

相似文献

1
Adherence to Dietary Recommendations among Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors and Cancer Outcome Associations.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Feb;29(2):386-395. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0872. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
2
Diet Quality and Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival: The Pathways Study.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Mar 2;5(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab019. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Adherence to dietary guidelines and mortality: a report from prospective cohort studies of 134,000 Chinese adults in urban Shanghai.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug;100(2):693-700. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.079194. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
7
Better postdiagnosis diet quality is associated with reduced risk of death among postmenopausal women with invasive breast cancer in the women's health initiative.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Apr;23(4):575-83. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1162. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
10
Dietary Patterns and Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: Results From the Women's Health Initiative.
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 May 1;176(5):645-52. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0482.

引用本文的文献

2
Dietary interventions and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Public Health Afr. 2025 Jun 26;16(1):1325. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i1.1325. eCollection 2025.
6
Impact of Lifestyle Modifications on Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 10;61(2):307. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020307.
8
Mechanisms by Which Pharmacotherapy May Impact Cancer Risk among Individuals with Overweight and Obesity.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;16(19):3275. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193275.
9
The Healthy Eating Index-2015 and All-Cause/Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.
Adv Nutr. 2024 Mar;15(3):100166. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100166. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2019.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
3
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1591-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021.
6
Aspirin Disrupts the Crosstalk of Angiogenic and Inflammatory Cytokines between 4T1 Breast Cancer Cells and Macrophages.
Mediators Inflamm. 2018 Jun 24;2018:6380643. doi: 10.1155/2018/6380643. eCollection 2018.
7
Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Healthy Eating Index.
Nutrients. 2018 Jan 24;10(2):114. doi: 10.3390/nu10020114.
8
Diet in women with breast cancer compared to healthy controls - What is the difference?
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Feb;32:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
9
Diet Quality, Inflammation, and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Pilot Study Data.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Apr;118(4):578-588.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
10
The Lifestyle Change Experiences of Cancer Survivors.
J Nurs Res. 2017 Oct;25(5):328-335. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000178.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验