Suppr超能文献

常规由护士主导的困扰筛查和讨论是否能提高接受根治性治疗的乳腺癌患者的生活质量?一项随机对照试验。

Does a regular nurse-led distress screening and discussion improve quality of life of breast cancer patients treated with curative intent? A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2020 Apr;29(4):719-728. doi: 10.1002/pon.5324. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate whether regular screening with the distress thermometer (DT) by a nurse improved global quality of life (QOL) of patients with breast cancer (BC) treated with curative intent.

METHODS

BC patients were randomized between regular screening for distress with a nurse-led DT intervention (NDTI) and usual care (UC). Both groups filled out questionnaires at baseline, after each received treatment modality and at follow-up visits up to 2 years. At these points, the intervention group received also the NDTI. The primary outcome was the global QOL of the EORTC QLQ C30 at 2 years after the end of treatment. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis, using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), generalized least squares, and interaction analyses.

RESULTS

Of 194 randomized patients, 153 filled out the questionnaires up to 2 years after treatment. There was no significant difference between NDTI and UC in global QOL 2 years after the end of treatment (mean diff. = -1∙273, P = .610; 95% CI [-6.195; 3.649]). Subgroup analysis of patients who received multimodality treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, n = 66) showed a significant between-group difference in global QOL over time (mean diff. = -10, P < .001; 95% CI [-14.835; -5.167]) together with other secondary outcome measures in favor of the NDTI.

CONCLUSION

NDTI did not lead to a significant improvement in global QOL 2 years after the end of treatment for patients with BC. However, the findings indicate that BC patients who received multimodality treatment may benefit from NDTI.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT),以研究护士定期使用痛苦温度计(DT)筛查是否能改善有治愈意图的乳腺癌(BC)患者的整体生活质量(QOL)。

方法

将 BC 患者随机分为接受护士主导的 DT 干预(NDTI)常规筛查的痛苦组和常规护理(UC)组。两组患者在基线时、每次接受治疗后以及治疗结束后 2 年的随访时填写问卷。此时,干预组还接受了 NDTI。主要结局是 EORTC QLQ C30 在治疗结束后 2 年内的整体 QOL。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)、广义最小二乘法和交互分析进行意向治疗分析。

结果

在 194 名随机患者中,有 153 名患者在治疗结束后 2 年内填写了问卷。治疗结束后 2 年,NDTI 与 UC 在整体 QOL 方面没有显著差异(平均差值=-1.273,P=0.610;95%CI[-6.195;3.649])。对接受多模态治疗(手术、放疗和化疗,n=66)的患者进行亚组分析,显示整体 QOL 随时间存在显著的组间差异(平均差值=-10,P<.001;95%CI[-14.835;-5.167]),同时其他次要结局也有利于 NDTI。

结论

NDTI 并未导致 BC 患者治疗结束后 2 年内整体 QOL 显著改善。然而,研究结果表明,接受多模态治疗的 BC 患者可能受益于 NDTI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验