Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
The Bizzell Group, LLC, Lanham, MD.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(11):1937-1945. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz213.
Risk perception is an important construct in many health behavior theories. Smoking risk perceptions are thoughts and feelings about the harms associated with cigarette smoking. Wide variation in the terminology, definition, and assessment of this construct makes it difficult to draw conclusions about the associations of risk perceptions with smoking behaviors. To understand optimal methods of assessing adults' cigarette smoking risk perceptions (among both smokers and nonsmokers), we reviewed best practices from the tobacco control literature, and where gaps were identified, we looked more broadly to the research on risk perceptions in other health domains. Based on this review, we suggest assessments of risk perceptions (1) about multiple smoking-related health harms, (2) about harms over a specific timeframe, and (3) for the person affected by the harm. For the measurement of perceived likelihood in particular (ie, the perceived chance of harm from smoking based largely on deliberative thought), we suggest including (4) unconditional and conditional items (stipulating smoking behavior) and (5) absolute and comparative items and including (6) comparisons to specific populations through (7) direct and indirect assessments. We also suggest including (8) experiential (ostensibly automatic, somatic perceptions of vulnerability to a harm) and affective (emotional reactions to a potential harm) risk perception items. We also offer suggestions for (9) response options and (10) the assessment of risk perception at multiple time points. Researchers can use this resource to inform the selection, use, and future development of smoking risk perception measures.
Incorporating the measurement suggestions for cigarette smoking risk perceptions that are presented will help researchers select items most appropriate for their research questions and will contribute to greater consistency in the assessment of smoking risk perceptions among adults.
风险认知是许多健康行为理论中的一个重要结构。吸烟风险认知是对与吸烟相关的危害的想法和感受。这个结构的术语、定义和评估方法存在广泛的差异,使得难以得出关于风险认知与吸烟行为之间关联的结论。为了了解评估成年人吸烟风险认知(包括吸烟者和非吸烟者)的最佳方法,我们回顾了烟草控制文献中的最佳实践,在发现差距的地方,我们更广泛地研究了其他健康领域风险认知的研究。基于这一综述,我们建议对风险认知进行评估:(1)关于多种与吸烟相关的健康危害,(2)关于特定时间段内的危害,以及(3)针对受危害影响的人。特别是对于感知可能性的测量(即,基于深思熟虑的想法对吸烟危害的感知可能性),我们建议包括(4)无条件和条件项目(规定吸烟行为)和(5)绝对和比较项目,并包括(6)通过(7)直接和间接评估与特定人群进行比较。我们还建议包括(8)体验性(对伤害易感性的显然自动的、躯体感知)和情感性(对潜在伤害的情绪反应)风险认知项目。我们还为(9)响应选项和(10)在多个时间点评估风险认知提供了建议。研究人员可以利用这一资源来为吸烟风险认知的选择、使用和未来发展提供信息。
纳入本文提出的关于吸烟风险认知的测量建议,将有助于研究人员为其研究问题选择最合适的项目,并有助于提高成年人吸烟风险认知评估的一致性。