Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.
Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
People's beliefs about others are often impervious to new evidence: we continue to cooperate with ingroup defectors and refuse to see outgroup enemies as rehabilitated. Resistance to updating beliefs with new information has historically been interpreted as reflecting bias or motivated cognition, but recent work in Bayesian inference suggests that belief maintenance can be compatible with procedural rationality. We propose a mentalizing account of belief maintenance, which holds that protecting strong priors by generating alternative explanations for surprising information involves more mentalizing about the target than nonrational discounting. We review the neuroscientific evidence supporting this approach, and discuss how both types of processing can lead to fitness benefits.
我们继续与内群体叛徒合作,拒绝将外群体敌人视为改过自新的人。从历史上看,人们抗拒根据新信息更新自己的信仰被解释为反映了偏见或动机认知,但贝叶斯推理的最新研究表明,信仰的维持可以与程序性理性兼容。我们提出了一个关于信仰维持的心理理论解释,该解释认为,通过为令人惊讶的信息生成替代解释来保护强烈的先验假设,需要更多地对目标进行心理理论思考,而不是非理性的折扣。我们回顾了支持这种方法的神经科学证据,并讨论了这两种类型的处理如何都能带来适应度上的好处。