Suppr超能文献

一项评估regorafenib 在既往接受化疗和帕唑帕尼治疗的非脂肪肉瘤患者中的活性和安全性的双盲安慰剂对照随机 II 期试验。

A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial assessing the activity and safety of regorafenib in non-adipocytic sarcoma patients previously treated with both chemotherapy and pazopanib.

机构信息

Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille and Lille University Hospital, Lille University, Lille, France.

Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2020 Feb;126:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) management remains an unmet medical need. We assessed the activity and safety of regorafenib in patients with metastatic non-adipocytic STS who were previously treated with both chemotherapy and pazopanib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter comparative randomized phase II trial included patients with histologically proven advanced and inoperable STS. Patients receiving placebo were offered optional cross-over for centrally confirmed disease progression. Primary end-point was centrally reviewed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours-based progression-free survival (PFS), analysed on the intent-to-treat data set. In total, 24 events were required for 90% power, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.33 (median PFS, 3.6 versus 1.2 months), and 1-sided α = 0.1 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01900743).

RESULTS

From December 2015 to October 2017, 37 patients were randomized; 18 to regorafenib and 19 to placebo. Thirteen patients assigned to placebo switched to regorafenib after progression. Median follow-up was 27.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.4-not reached). We observed a significant PFS benefit of regorafenib compared with placebo (adjusted HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15-0.74; p = 0.0007 median PFS = 2.1 versus 1.1 months, respectively), and a large and nearly significant overall survival (OS) benefit despite the cross-over (adjusted HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.23-1.06; p = 0.007; median OS = 17.8 versus 8.2 months). Before cross-over, the most common grade III or higher adverse events were lymphopenia (5 versus 1, respectively), diarrhoea (4 versus 0), dyspnoea (3 versus 1), skin toxicity (3 versus 0), arterial hypertension (2 versus 0), and increased transaminases (2 versus 0).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated a meaningful clinical anti-tumour activity with regorafenib in heavily pre-treated patients with non-adipocytic STS.

摘要

背景

转移性软组织肉瘤(STS)的治疗仍然是一个未满足的医学需求。我们评估了regorafenib 在既往接受化疗和 pazopanib 治疗的转移性非脂肪性 STS 患者中的活性和安全性。

患者和方法

这项双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心比较随机 II 期试验纳入了组织学证实的晚期和不可手术的 STS 患者。接受安慰剂的患者在中央确认疾病进展后可选择交叉使用。主要终点是中央审查的基于实体瘤反应评价标准的无进展生存期(PFS),根据意向治疗数据集进行分析。总共需要 24 例事件,以达到 90%的效能,风险比(HR)= 0.33(中位 PFS,3.6 个月与 1.2 个月),单侧α= 0.1(ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01900743)。

结果

2015 年 12 月至 2017 年 10 月,共纳入 37 例患者进行随机分组,18 例患者接受regorafenib 治疗,19 例患者接受安慰剂治疗。13 例安慰剂组患者在进展后转为regorafenib 治疗。中位随访时间为 27.2 个月(95%置信区间[CI]:24.4-未达到)。与安慰剂相比,regorafenib 显著延长了 PFS(调整后的 HR=0.33;95%CI:0.15-0.74;p=0.0007,中位 PFS 分别为 2.1 个月和 1.1 个月),尽管存在交叉治疗,但 OS 也有显著且接近显著的获益(调整后的 HR=0.49;95%CI:0.23-1.06;p=0.007,中位 OS 分别为 17.8 个月和 8.2 个月)。交叉前,最常见的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件是淋巴细胞减少(分别为 5 例和 1 例)、腹泻(4 例和 0 例)、呼吸困难(3 例和 1 例)、皮肤毒性(3 例和 0 例)、动脉高血压(2 例和 0 例)和转氨酶升高(2 例和 0 例)。

结论

本研究表明,在既往接受过多线治疗的非脂肪性 STS 患者中,regorafenib 具有显著的临床抗肿瘤活性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验