Institute of Neurosciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Cumbayá, Ecuador.
College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 May;55(3):332-344. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12521. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
People experiencing homelessness are at increased risk of neurological disorder due to multiple factors such as substance abuse, infection, and higher rates of serious mental illness and traumatic brain injury. This could affect cognitive and language skills. Indeed, past research has suggested that certain language-related skills tend to be lower in people experiencing homelessness. However, that research has compared homeless samples with age-matched normative samples and not with samples of people from similar socio-economic backgrounds. Therefore, it is unclear whether homelessness is even a relevant factor, or if adults who are homeless tend to have appropriate linguistic skills relative to their social and educational background.
To compare the language skills of a group of adults with histories of homelessness with an education-matched control group. It was hypothesized that participants with histories of homelessness would have worse language performance than their matched controls.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: A quasi-experimental design was employed involving 17 adults with histories of homelessness, mainly rough sleeping, in the city of Quito in Ecuador, and a sample of 16 adults who had never been homeless. All were assessed with measures of head injury, substance dependence, affective disorder and language skills. A paired-sample analysis was performed on homeless and control participants matched for educational background, used as an index of socio-economic background.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: The mean years of formal education was low in both the homeless sample (mean = 5.82 years) and the control sample (mean = 6.75 years). There were no differences between the groups for any demographic or clinical factors, nor for a measure of expected or 'premorbid' ability based on single-word reading, nor for current non-verbal cognitive functioning. In contrast, the homeless group scored significantly worse than the control group on measures of auditory comprehension and oral expression.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Adults with histories of homelessness may have worse language skills than would be expected based on their educational backgrounds and non-verbal cognitive abilities. It is possible that some of this lower language ability is pathological, in the form of either a developmental language disorder or an acquired impairment. As such, some adults who are homeless may benefit from therapy directed at clinical language disorders.
由于多种因素,如药物滥用、感染以及更高比例的严重精神疾病和创伤性脑损伤,无家可归者患神经障碍的风险增加。这可能会影响认知和语言技能。事实上,过去的研究表明,无家可归者在某些与语言相关的技能上往往较低。然而,这些研究将无家可归者样本与年龄匹配的正常样本进行了比较,而不是与来自类似社会经济背景的样本进行比较。因此,目前尚不清楚无家可归是否是一个相关因素,或者无家可归的成年人相对于他们的社会和教育背景是否具有适当的语言技能。
比较一组有过无家可归经历的成年人与教育匹配的对照组的语言技能。假设有过无家可归经历的参与者的语言表现会比他们的对照组差。
采用准实验设计,涉及厄瓜多尔基多市的 17 名有过无家可归经历的成年人,主要是流浪,以及 16 名从未无家可归的成年人对照组。所有参与者都接受了头部受伤、物质依赖、情感障碍和语言技能的评估。对有过无家可归经历和无家可归经历的参与者进行了配对样本分析,他们接受了教育背景匹配,作为社会经济背景的指标。
无家可归者样本(平均=5.82 年)和对照组(平均=6.75 年)的正规教育年限均较低。两组在任何人口统计学或临床因素、基于单个单词阅读的预期或“发病前”能力测量值,或当前非语言认知功能方面均无差异。相比之下,无家可归组在听觉理解和口语表达方面的得分明显低于对照组。
有过无家可归经历的成年人的语言技能可能不如根据其教育背景和非语言认知能力所预期的那样好。这种较低的语言能力可能是病理性的,表现为发育性语言障碍或获得性损伤。因此,一些无家可归的成年人可能受益于针对临床语言障碍的治疗。