Behavioral Medicine Laboratory, School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Jun 12;54(7):495-509. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz068.
Socioecological models highlight the potential direct and indirect effects of multiple levels of influence in explaining physical activity (PA). Social cognitive theories, however, position individual cognitions as the mediator of external factors such as the built environment when explaining PA.
To appraise the evidence for direct and indirect associations between the built environment and social cognition to predict PA.
Literature searches were concluded in February 2019 using five common databases. Eligible studies were in the English language that included any direct and indirect tests of individual perceptions and the built environment with PA.
The initial search yielded 18,521 hits, which was reduced to 46 independent studies of primarily medium quality after screening for eligibility criteria. Findings were grouped by type of PA then grouped by the type of individual and built environment constructs within the model, and subdivided by adult and youth samples. There was evidence that self-efficacy/perceived control accounted for the covariance between environmental accessibility/convenience and total PA, while habit accounted for the covariance in this relationship for transport PA, particularly in adult samples. There was no evidence that the built environment had a direct association with PA after controlling for individual-level factors.
The results provide initial support for the mediation tenet in social cognition models for the relationship between individual, built environment, and PA. In practice, these findings highlight the need for coordinated interventions of individual and environmental change.
社会生态模型强调了多个层次的影响在解释身体活动(PA)方面的潜在直接和间接作用。然而,社会认知理论将个体认知置于构建环境等外部因素的中介地位,以解释 PA。
评估构建环境与社会认知之间直接和间接关联预测 PA 的证据。
文献检索于 2019 年 2 月完成,使用了五个常见数据库。符合条件的研究为英文,包括个体感知和 PA 与构建环境之间的任何直接和间接测试。
最初的搜索产生了 18521 个结果,经过筛选符合条件后,减少到 46 项主要为中等质量的独立研究。结果按 PA 类型分组,然后按模型中的个体和构建环境结构的类型分组,并按成人和青年样本进一步细分。有证据表明,自我效能/感知控制解释了环境可达性/便利性与总 PA 之间的协方差,而习惯则解释了交通 PA 中这种关系的协方差,特别是在成人样本中。在控制了个体水平因素后,没有证据表明构建环境与 PA 之间存在直接关联。
研究结果初步支持了社会认知模型中个体、构建环境与 PA 之间关系的中介原则。在实践中,这些发现强调了协调个人和环境变化干预的必要性。