Department of Medicine Austin Health The University of Melbourne Heidelberg Victoria Australia.
Department of Cardiology Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 21;9(2):e013346. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013346. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
Background Dilated cardiomyopathy may be heritable but shows extensive genetic heterogeneity. The utility of whole exome sequencing as a first-line genetic test for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in a contemporary "real-world" setting has not been specifically established. Using whole exome sequencing with rigorous, evidence-based variant interpretation, we aimed to identify the prevalence of a molecular diagnosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in a clinical setting. Methods and Results Whole exome sequencing was performed in eligible patients (n=83) with idiopathic or familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Variants were prioritized for curation in up to 247 genes and classified using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-based criteria. Ten (12%) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Eight (10%) participants had truncating variants classified as variants of uncertain significance. Five (6%) participants had variants of unknown significance according to strict American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria but classified as either pathogenic or likely pathogenic by other clinical laboratories. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were found in 8 genes (all within tier 1 genes), 2 (20%) of which are not included in a standard commercially available dilated cardiomyopathy panel. Using our bioinformatics pipeline, there was an average of 0.74 variants of uncertain significance per case with ≈0.75 person-hours needed to interpret each of these variants. Conclusions Whole exome sequencing is an effective diagnostic tool for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. With stringent classification using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria, the rate of detection of pathogenic variants is lower than previous reports. Efforts to improve adherence to these guidelines will be important to prevent erroneous misclassification of nonpathogenic variants in dilated cardiomyopathy genetic testing and inappropriate cascade screening.
扩张型心肌病可能具有遗传性,但表现出广泛的遗传异质性。全外显子组测序作为一种一线遗传检测方法,用于当前“真实世界”环境中扩张型心肌病患者,其效用尚未得到专门确立。我们使用全外显子组测序,并采用严格的、基于证据的变异解释方法,旨在确定在临床环境中扩张型心肌病患者分子诊断的患病率。
对符合条件的特发性或家族性扩张型心肌病患者(n=83)进行全外显子组测序。将变异进行分类整理,最多可整理至 247 个基因,并根据美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院的标准进行分类。10 例(12%)患者存在致病性或可能致病性变异。8 例(10%)患者存在截断变异,被归类为意义不明的变异。根据严格的美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院标准,5 例(6%)患者的变异为意义不明的变异,但其他临床实验室将其归类为致病性或可能致病性变异。在 8 个基因(均位于 1 级基因)中发现了致病性或可能致病性变异(2 个变异),其中 2 个变异不在标准的商业扩张型心肌病基因检测panel 中。使用我们的生物信息学管道,每个病例平均有 0.74 个意义不明的变异,每个变异的解释大约需要 0.75 个人小时。
全外显子组测序是扩张型心肌病患者的有效诊断工具。使用美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院的严格分类标准,致病性变异的检出率低于之前的报道。努力提高对这些指南的依从性,对于防止在扩张型心肌病基因检测中错误地将非致病性变异归类为致病性变异,以及避免不适当的级联筛查,将非常重要。