The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Psychol Med. 2021 May;51(7):1166-1174. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719004069. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
This study aimed to examine the efficacy of combining paroxetine and mirtazapine v. switching to mirtazapine, for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have had an insufficient response to SSRI monotherapy (paroxetine) after the first 2 weeks of treatment.
This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, three-arm study recruited participants from five hospitals in China. Eligible participants were aged 18-60 years with MDD of at least moderate severity. Participants received paroxetine during a 2-week open-label phase and patients who had not achieved early improvement were randomized to paroxetine, mirtazapine or paroxetine combined with mirtazapine for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 17-item (HAMD-17) scores 6 weeks after randomization.
A total of 204 patients who showed early non-response to paroxetine monotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either mirtazapine and placebo (n = 68), paroxetine and placebo (n = 68) or mirtazapine and paroxetine (n = 68), with 164 patients completing the outcome assessment. At week 8, the least squares (LS) mean change of HAMD-17 scores did not significantly differ among the three groups, (12.98 points) in the mirtazapine group, (12.50 points) in the paroxetine group and (13.27 points) in the mirtazapine plus paroxetine combination group. Participants in the paroxetine monotherapy group were least likely to experience adverse effects.
After 8 weeks follow-up, paroxetine monotherapy, mirtazapine monotherapy and paroxetine/mirtazapine combination therapy were equally effective in non-improvers at 2 weeks. The results of this trial do not support a recommendation to routinely offer additional treatment or a switch in treatment strategies for MDD patients who do not show early improvement after 2 weeks of antidepressant treatment.
本研究旨在考察帕罗西汀联合米氮平与换用米氮平治疗的疗效比较,对象为接受 SSRI 单药(帕罗西汀)治疗 2 周后反应不佳的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者。
这是一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、三臂研究,招募了来自中国五家医院的参与者。合格的参与者年龄在 18-60 岁之间,患有至少中度严重程度的 MDD。参与者在 2 周的开放标签阶段接受帕罗西汀治疗,未早期改善的患者随机分配至帕罗西汀、米氮平或帕罗西汀联合米氮平治疗 6 周。主要结局是随机分组后 6 周时汉密尔顿抑郁量表 17 项(HAMD-17)评分的改善。
共有 204 名对帕罗西汀单药治疗早期无反应的患者被随机分配接受米氮平联合安慰剂(n = 68)、帕罗西汀联合安慰剂(n = 68)或米氮平联合帕罗西汀(n = 68)治疗,其中 164 名患者完成了结局评估。在第 8 周,米氮平组 HAMD-17 评分的最小二乘(LS)均数变化为 12.98 分,帕罗西汀组为 12.50 分,米氮平联合帕罗西汀组为 13.27 分,三组间差异无统计学意义。帕罗西汀单药治疗组患者最不可能出现不良反应。
经过 8 周随访,在治疗 2 周时无改善的患者中,帕罗西汀单药治疗、米氮平单药治疗和帕罗西汀/米氮平联合治疗同样有效。本试验结果不支持对治疗 2 周后无早期改善的 MDD 患者常规提供额外治疗或改变治疗策略的建议。